Literature DB >> 7117630

Parity-specific fertility intentions and uncertainty: the United States, 1970 to 1976.

S P Morgan.   

Abstract

A theoretical and analytic model of fertility intentions is proposed which treats "don't know" responses and other uncertain responses as distinct from more firm intentions. Methodologically, these analyses show that "don't know" responses need not be treated as missing data, but instead are both valid and meaningful responses. Furthermore, eliminating these uncertain respondents would have the negative effects of distorting across survey comparisons in intentions due to shifts in aggregate uncertainty, reducing the likelihood of accurately detecting shifts in fertility intentions, and lessening the representatives of the sample analyzed. Substantively, in conjunction with Morgan (1981), these results show that the sharp 1965-76 decline in the likelihood of intending more births at parities 2 through 5 occurred as women halted childbearing at minimal acceptable levels and postponed further childbearing. With time (or age), this delayed fertility became fertility about which the respondent was uncertain and, finally, fertility foregone. Since 1970, similar shifts are observed at parities 0 and 1, perhaps foreshadowing an increase in voluntary childlessness and one-child families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7117630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demography        ISSN: 0070-3370


  15 in total

1.  The measurement of family size preferences and subsequent fertility.

Authors:  L C Coombs
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1974-11

2.  Some observations on the economic framework for fertility analysis.

Authors:  N K Namboodiri
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1972-07

3.  The predictive validity of reproductive intentions.

Authors:  C F Westoff; N B Ryder
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1977-11

4.  Contraception and sterilization in the United States, 1965-1975.

Authors:  C F Westoff; E F Jones
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug

5.  Can we believe recent data on birth expectations in the United States?

Authors:  J Blake
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1974-02

6.  Changes in fertility expectations and preferences between 1962 and 1977: their relation to final parity.

Authors:  R Freedman; D S Freedman; A D Thornton
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1980-11

7.  National survey of family growth, cycle I: sample design, estimation procedures, and variance estimation.

Authors:  D K French
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  1978-01

8.  Population policy: will current programs succeed? Grounds for skepticism concerning the demographic effectiveness of family planning are considered.

Authors:  K Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Intention and uncertainty at later stages of childbearing: the United States 1965 and 1970.

Authors:  S P Morgan
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1981-08

10.  Underlying family-size preferences and reproductive behavior.

Authors:  L C Coombs
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  1979-01
View more
  23 in total

1.  Intended and Ideal Family Size in the United States, 1970-2002.

Authors:  Kellie J Hagewen; S Philip Morgan
Journal:  Popul Dev Rev       Date:  2005-09-01

2.  Uncertainty and Fertility in a Generalized AIDS Epidemic.

Authors:  Jenny Trinitapoli; Sara Yeatman
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  2011-12-01

3.  The demography of words: The global decline in non-numeric fertility preferences, 1993-2011.

Authors:  Margaret Frye; Lauren Bachan
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2017-04-25

4.  Pregnancy intentions among women who do not try: focusing on women who are okay either way.

Authors:  Julia McQuillan; Arthur L Greil; Karina M Shreffler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-02

5.  Estimating birth stopping and spacing behavior.

Authors:  D C Ewbank
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1989-08

6.  Individual and couple intentions for more children: a research note.

Authors:  S P Morgan
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1985-02

7.  Uncertain future, non-numeric preferences, and the fertility transition: A case study of rural Mozambique.

Authors:  Sarah R Hayford; Victor Agadjanian
Journal:  Etude Popul Afr       Date:  2011

8.  What are the determinants of delayed childbearing and permanent childlessness in the United States?

Authors:  D E Bloom; J Trussell
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1984-11

9.  Family influences on family size preferences.

Authors:  W G Axinn; M E Clarkberg; A Thornton
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1994-02

Review 10.  Recent trends in the timing of first births in the United States.

Authors:  R B Chen; S P Morgan
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1991-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.