Literature DB >> 7106561

Estimates of inbreeding in a natural population: a comparison of sampling properties.

M Curie-Cohen.   

Abstract

The average inbreeding coefficient f of a population can be estimated in several different ways based solely on the genotypic frequencies at a single locus. The means and variances of four different estimates have been compared. While the four estimates are equivalent when there are two alleles, the best estimates when there are three or more alleles are based upon total heterozygosity (Formula: see text) where x and y are the expected and observed number of heterozygotes) and the proportion of alleles that are homozygous (Formula: see text) where k = the number of alleles, aii = the number of AiAi homozygotes, and 2aij = the number of AiAj heterozygotes). Both are minimally based estimates of f and have identical sampling variances when all alleles are equally frequent. However, when alleles have different frequencies, the choice between these two estimates depends on the gene frequencies and the true inbreeding coefficient of a population; f2 is the best estimate when the true average inbreeding coefficient is suspected to be low or f = 0, while f1 is best in populations with large average inbreeding coefficients. Approximate sampling variances of these two estimates are given for any f and any number of alleles with arbitrary gene frequencies; these approximations are accurate for samples as small as n = 100. The chi-square and maximum likelihood estimates of f are not as good for realistic sample sizes.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7106561      PMCID: PMC1201815     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  1 in total

1.  Detection of inbreeding effects by the chi-square test on genotypic and phenotypic frequencies.

Authors:  M Haber
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 11.025

  1 in total
  13 in total

1.  Distribution of nonrandom associations between pairs of protein loci along the third chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Carlos Zapata; Concepción Núñez; Teresa Velasco
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A note on the variance of the estimate of the fixation index F.

Authors:  Paulo A Otto; Renan B Lemes
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Potential bias in inbreeding depression estimates when using pedigree relationships to assess the degree of homozygosity for loci under selection.

Authors:  A F Groen; B W Kennedy; J J Eissen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Comments on 'A note on the variance of the estimate of the fixation index F'.

Authors:  Ranjit Chakraborty
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Testing heterozygote excess and deficiency.

Authors:  F Rousset; M Raymond
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic variation in cultivars of diploid ryegrass,Lolium perenne andL. multiflorum, at five enzyme systems.

Authors:  H Ostergaard; G Nielsen; H Johansen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Genetic composition and diploid hybrid speciation of a high mountain pine, Pinus densata, native to the Tibetan plateau.

Authors:  X R Wang; A E Szmidt; O Savolainen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Evolutionary analysis of Pinus densata Masters, a putative Tertiary hybrid : 1. Allozyme variation.

Authors:  X R Wang; A E Szmidt; A Lewandowski; Z R Wang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  MIDAS: software for analysis and visualisation of interallelic disequilibrium between multiallelic markers.

Authors:  Tom R Gaunt; Santiago Rodriguez; Carlos Zapata; Ian N M Day
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.

Authors:  Sonia E Eynard; Jack J Windig; Grégoire Leroy; Rianne van Binsbergen; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.