Literature DB >> 24169896

Potential bias in inbreeding depression estimates when using pedigree relationships to assess the degree of homozygosity for loci under selection.

A F Groen1, B W Kennedy, J J Eissen.   

Abstract

A potential bias in estimation of inbreeding depression when using pedigree relationships to assess the degree of homozygosity for loci under selection is indicated. A comparison of inbreeding coefficients based on either pedigree or genotypic frequencies indicated that, as a result of selection, the inbreeding coefficient based on pedigree might not correspond with the random drift of allelic frequencies. Apparent differences in average levels of both inbreeding coefficients were obtained depending on the genetic model (additive versus dominance, initial allelic frequencies, heritability) and the selection system assumed (no versus mass selection). In the absence of selection, allelic frequencies within a small population change over generations due to random drift, and the pedigree-based inbreeding coefficient gives a proper assessment of the accompanying probability of increased homozygosity within a 'replicate' by indicating the variance of allelic frequencies over replicates. With selection, in addition to random drift, directional change in allelic frequencies is not accounted for by the pedigree-based inbreeding coefficient. This result implies that estimation of inbreeding depression for traits under either direct or indirect selection, estimated by a regression of performance on pedigree-based coefficients, should be carefully interpreted.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 24169896     DOI: 10.1007/BF00223295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  9 in total

1.  Inbreeding in Swiss Braunvieh and its influence on breeding values predicted from a repeatability animal model.

Authors:  L Casanova; C Hagger; N Kuenzi; M Schneeberger
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Genetic evaluation methods for populations with dominance and inbreeding.

Authors:  I J de Boer; I Hoeschele
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Prediction of additive and dominance effects in selected or unselected populations with inbreeding.

Authors:  I J de Boer; J A van Arendonk
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Analysis of levels of inbreeding and inbreeding depression in Jersey cattle.

Authors:  F Miglior; B Szkotnicki; E B Burnside
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Prediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populations.

Authors:  N R Wray; R Thompson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Use of ev loci as a measure of inbreeding in domestic fowls.

Authors:  N Bumstead; L I Messer; N G Greenwood
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.095

7.  Estimates of inbreeding in a natural population: a comparison of sampling properties.

Authors:  M Curie-Cohen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Inbreeding within an artificially bred dairy cattle population.

Authors:  F R Allaire; C R Henderson
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Effective sizes of livestock populations to prevent a decline in fitness.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; J A Woolliams
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.699

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Nonequivalent lethal equivalents: Models and inbreeding metrics for unbiased estimation of inbreeding load.

Authors:  Pirmin Nietlisbach; Stefanie Muff; Jane M Reid; Michael C Whitlock; Lukas F Keller
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.183

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.