Literature DB >> 7102511

Acoustical performance of the stethoscope: a comparative analysis.

J R Kindig, T P Beeson, R W Campbell, F Andries, M E Tavel.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1982        PMID： 7102511     DOI： 10.1016/0002-8703(82)90203-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN： 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  The Intelligibility of the Reversed-Stethoscope Technique in Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Raphaelle M Koerber; Linh Vaccarello; Allan Ho
Journal:  Can Geriatr J       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Electronic Stethoscope Filtering Mimics the Perceived Sound Characteristics of Acoustic Stethoscope.

Authors:  Valerie Rennoll; Ian McLane; Dimitra Emmanouilidou; James West; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.772

3.  Validation of an effective, low cost, Free/open access 3D-printed stethoscope.

Authors:  Alexander Pavlosky; Jennifer Glauche; Spencer Chambers; Mahmoud Al-Alawi; Kliment Yanev; Tarek Loubani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  No-touch measurements of vital signs in small conscious animals.

Authors:  Xiaonan Hui; Edwin C Kan
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Non-Contact Vital Signs Monitoring of Dog and Cat Using a UWB Radar.

Authors:  Pengfei Wang; Yangyang Ma; Fulai Liang; Yang Zhang; Xiao Yu; Zhao Li; Qiang An; Hao Lv; Jianqi Wang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Facial Muscle Activity Recognition with Reconfigurable Differential Stethoscope-Microphones.

Authors:  Hymalai Bello; Bo Zhou; Paul Lukowicz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 3.576
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.