Literature DB >> 32870803

Electronic Stethoscope Filtering Mimics the Perceived Sound Characteristics of Acoustic Stethoscope.

Valerie Rennoll, Ian McLane, Dimitra Emmanouilidou, James West, Mounya Elhilali.   

Abstract

Electronic stethoscopes offer several advantages over conventional acoustic stethoscopes, including noise reduction, increased amplification, and ability to store and transmit sounds. However, the acoustical characteristics of electronic and acoustic stethoscopes can differ significantly, introducing a barrier for clinicians to transition to electronic stethoscopes. This work proposes a method to process lung sounds recorded by an electronic stethoscope, such that the sounds are perceived to have been captured by an acoustic stethoscope. The proposed method calculates an electronic-to-acoustic stethoscope filter by measuring the difference between the average frequency responses of an acoustic and an electronic stethoscope to multiple lung sounds. To validate the method, a change detection experiment was conducted with 51 medical professionals to compare filtered electronic, unfiltered electronic, and acoustic stethoscope lung sounds. Participants were asked to detect when transitions occurred in sounds comprising several sections of the three types of recordings. Transitions between the filtered electronic and acoustic stethoscope sections were detected, on average, by chance (sensitivity index equal to zero) and also detected significantly less than transitions between the unfiltered electronic and acoustic stethoscope sections ( ), demonstrating the effectiveness of the method to filter electronic stethoscopes to mimic an acoustic stethoscope. This processing could incentivize clinicians to adopt electronic stethoscopes by providing a means to shift between the sound characteristics of acoustic and electronic stethoscopes in a single device, allowing for a faster transition to new technology and greater appreciation for the electronic sound quality.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 32870803      PMCID: PMC7917155          DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.3020494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform        ISSN: 2168-2194            Impact factor:   5.772


  25 in total

1.  Investigating a compact phantom and setup for testing body sound transducers.

Authors:  Hansen A Mansy; Joshua Grahe; Thomas J Royston; Richard H Sandler
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Is the Stethoscope Becoming an Outdated Diagnostic Tool?

Authors:  William H Frishman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  [Computer-aided Diagnosis and New Electronic Stethoscope].

Authors:  Mei Huang; Hongying Liu; Xitian Pi; Yilu Ao; Zi Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi       Date:  2017-05-30

4.  Digital Stethoscope-Improved Auscultation at the Bedside.

Authors:  Barry Silverman; Michael Balk
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Utility of an advanced digital electronic stethoscope in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease compared with coronary computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Amgad N Makaryus; John N Makaryus; Alan Figgatt; Dan Mulholland; Harvey Kushner; John L Semmlow; Jennifer Mieres; Allen J Taylor
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  The relationship between normal lung sounds, age, and gender.

Authors:  V Gross; A Dittmar; T Penzel; F Schüttler; P von Wichert
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 7.  The electronic stethoscope.

Authors:  Shuang Leng; Ru San Tan; Kevin Tshun Chuan Chai; Chao Wang; Dhanjoo Ghista; Liang Zhong
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Sound differences between electronic and acoustic stethoscopes.

Authors:  Lukasz J Nowak; Karolina M Nowak
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Mechano-acoustic sensing of physiological processes and body motions via a soft wireless device placed at the suprasternal notch.

Authors:  KunHyuck Lee; Xiaoyue Ni; Jong Yoon Lee; Hany Arafa; David J Pe; Shuai Xu; Raudel Avila; Masahiro Irie; Joo Hee Lee; Ryder L Easterlin; Dong Hyun Kim; Ha Uk Chung; Omolara O Olabisi; Selam Getaneh; Esther Chung; Marc Hill; Jeremy Bell; Hokyung Jang; Claire Liu; Jun Bin Park; Jungwoo Kim; Sung Bong Kim; Sunita Mehta; Matt Pharr; Andreas Tzavelis; Jonathan T Reeder; Ivy Huang; Yujun Deng; Zhaoqian Xie; Charles R Davies; Yonggang Huang; John A Rogers
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 25.671

View more
  1 in total

1.  Digital auscultation as a novel childhood pneumonia diagnostic tool for community clinics in Sylhet, Bangladesh: protocol for a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Salahuddin Ahmed; Dipak Kumar Mitra; Harish Nair; Steven Cunningham; Ahad Mahmud Khan; Asmd Ashraful Islam; Ian Mitra McLane; Nabidul Haque Chowdhury; Nazma Begum; Mohammod Shahidullah; Muhammad Shariful Islam; John Norrie; Harry Campbell; Aziz Sheikh; Abdullah H Baqui; Eric D McCollum
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.