Literature DB >> 7095043

A time-course analysis of attentional tuning of the auditory evoked response.

M W Donald, M J Young.   

Abstract

This study examined the time course of attentional tuning of the N1 and P3 components of the auditory evoked potential. Human subjects were presented with two concurrent sequences of pure tone stimuli, one sequence delivered to each ear. They were instructed to listen to the tones in one ear and count randomly-embedded target stimuli, identified by pitch, while ignoring concurrent and physically equivalent stimuli in the other ear. Attention was then allocated to other ear-pitch combinations in subsequent runs. The rate of stimulation was rapid, an average of three stimuli per second per channel, to maximize N1 differences between channels. Evoked potentials were sampled at various times during each experimental run, to determine the time course of amplitude change in each auditory channel, as the subject tuned his neural response to the selected stimuli. The results indicated that N1 took 30-45 s to emerge as significantly larger in the attended channel, whereas P3 was instantly larger in the attended channel upon presenting the first rare stimulus of a run. The N1 effect disappeared for standard stimuli after about 7 min of stimulation, despite a continuously high rate of target identification. However, for the rare target stimuli, N1 and P3 remained at a higher level in the attended channel throughout the typical 15 min run. The study concludes that neural selectivity proceeds in a "top-down" manner, with the longer-latency P3 component showing a selective response sooner than N1. In addition, there is evidence that the selectivity of N1 tuning increases over time, with the continued focussing of attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7095043     DOI: 10.1007/BF00238630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  Differential enhancement of early and late components of the cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials during forced-paced cognitive tasks in man.

Authors:  J E Desmedt; D Robertson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Human vigilance and auditory evoked responses.

Authors:  H Fruhstorfer; R M Bergström
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-10

3.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Perceived rate of monotic and dichotically alternating clicks.

Authors:  S Axelrod; L T Guzy; I T Diamond
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Shifting attention between the ears.

Authors:  A M Treisman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Size-specific information channels and selective attention: visual evoked potential and behavioral measures.

Authors:  M R Harter; F H Previc
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-11

7.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man.

Authors:  N K Squires; K C Squires; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-04

8.  Selective auditory attention and early event-related potentials: a rejoinder.

Authors:  S A Hillyard
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1981-06

9.  The analysis of stimulus probability inside and outside the focus of attention, as reflected by the auditory N1 and P3 components.

Authors:  M W Donald; R Little
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1981-06

10.  Habituation and the human evoked potential.

Authors:  A L Megela; T J Teyler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1979-12
View more
  6 in total

1.  Dynamics of cortical responses to tone pairs in relation to task difficulty: a MEG study.

Authors:  Mor Nahum; Hanna Renvall; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Brain state-triggered stimulus delivery: An efficient tool for probing ongoing brain activity.

Authors:  M L Andermann; J Kauramäki; T Palomäki; C I Moore; R Hari; I P Jääskeläinen; M Sams
Journal:  Open J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-29

3.  The relevance of task-irrelevant sounds: hemispheric lateralization and interactions with task-relevant streams.

Authors:  Ana A Amaral; Dave R M Langers
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Interaction between attention and bottom-up saliency mediates the representation of foreground and background in an auditory scene.

Authors:  Mounya Elhilali; Juanjuan Xiang; Shihab A Shamma; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Dynamics of distraction: competition among auditory streams modulates gain and disrupts inter-trial phase coherence in the human electroencephalogram.

Authors:  Karla D Ponjavic-Conte; Dillon A Hambrook; Sebastian Pavlovic; Matthew S Tata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Relationship of Event-Related Potentials to the Vigilance Decrement.

Authors:  Ashley Haubert; Matt Walsh; Rachel Boyd; Megan Morris; Megan Wiedbusch; Mike Krusmark; Glenn Gunzelmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.