Literature DB >> 926022

Differential enhancement of early and late components of the cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials during forced-paced cognitive tasks in man.

J E Desmedt, D Robertson.   

Abstract

1. Cerebral potentials evoked by random sequences of electrical stimuli to four fingers were recorded in intact man performing selective attention tasks. Eye movements and other artifacts were excluded from the averaged traces. Different finger stimuli were designated as targets to be mentally counted in alternate runs of each experiment. The high mean random rate of stimuli (150/min) fully involved the processing capacities of the subject. Vigilance changes or differential expectancy effects were excluded by the reciprocal random design with four different sensory channels. Task-related enhancements of somatosensory evoked potentials (s.e.p.) components were estimated by comparison with the s.e.p.s to physically identical finger stimuli recorded in runs when the subject attended signals in the opposite hand. The experimental design avoided subject's fatigue.2. The primary s.e.p. components N(20) and P(45) were not significantly influenced and this excluded centrifugal gating of the corticipetal signals as a mechanism.3. The earliest task-related changes in s.e.p. occurred 55-135 msec (mean 77.7 msec) after the target finger stimuli. In most cases the negative N(140) component was markedly enhanced both for target signals and for non-targets in the adjacent finger of the same hand. However, in several subjects the targets elicited a positive P(100) component instead. Both N(104) and P(100) were larger at the contralateral parietal focus than ipsilaterally. They were definitely smaller at the vertex and frontal scalp locations.4. Enhancements of N(140) were not observed in similar random four-finger experiments carried out at a 4 times slower mean rate, but they occurred in a bisensory paradigm with finger shocks and acoustic clicks at that slower rate.5. A large positive P(400) component was only elicited by target stimuli. Its voltage was maximum over the parietal region and was equal on both sides.6. At least three categories of components can be differentiated in the cortical s.e.p. on the basis of their time domains (roughly 18-70 msec, 70 to 200-250 msec and over 200 msec after the finger stimuli), cerebral hemispheres topography and cognitive parameters. Verbal instructions defining specific perceptual tasks can to a large extent switch on and off the components of the second and third categories when the processing resources of motivated subjects are fully committed in a well designed forced paced paradigm. In certain individuals physiological evidence for a different ;stimulus set' processing of target (P(100)) and non-target (N(140)) signals was documented for the first time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 926022      PMCID: PMC1353632          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  38 in total

1.  CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION: AN ELECTRIC SIGN OF SENSORIMOTOR ASSOCIATION AND EXPECTANCY IN THE HUMAN BRAIN.

Authors:  W G WALTER; R COOPER; V J ALDRIDGE; W C MCCALLUM; A L WINTER
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1964-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  EVOKED RESPONSES TO NUMERICAL AND NON-NUMERICAL VISUAL STIMULI WHILE PROBLEM SOLVING.

Authors:  R M CHAPMAN; H R BRAGDON
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1964-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED POTENTIALS IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND IN PATIENTS WITH LESIONS OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM.

Authors:  D R GIBLIN
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1964-05-08       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  [CHANGES IN THE BRAIN POTENTIAL IN VOLUNTARY MOVEMENTS AND PASSIVE MOVEMENTS IN MAN: READINESS POTENTIAL AND REAFFERENT POTENTIALS].

Authors:  H H KORNHUBER; L DEECKE
Journal:  Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere       Date:  1965-05-10

5.  The relative excitability and conduction velocity of sensory and motor nerve fibres in man.

Authors:  G D DAWSON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1956-02-28       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Spinal pathways projecting to the cerebral first somatosensory area in the monkey.

Authors:  S A Andersson; K Norrsell; U Norrsell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Sound-proofed rooms for experimentation in sensory physiology.

Authors:  J Hougardy; J E Desmedt
Journal:  Arch Int Physiol Biochim       Date:  1967-04

8.  Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination.

Authors:  W Ritter; R Simson; H G Vaughan
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-12

9.  Traveling waves of the human scalp-recorded somatosensory evoked response: effects of differences in recording technique and sleep on somatosensory and somatomotor responses.

Authors:  R Q Cracco
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-12

10.  Cerebral evoked potential correlates in forced-paced tasks.

Authors:  J Debecker; J E Desmedt
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1971-11-24
View more
  33 in total

1.  Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Bettina Forster
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hands behind your back: effects of arm posture on tactile attention in the space behind the body.

Authors:  Helge Gillmeister; Bettina Forster
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Centrifugal regulation of task-relevant somatosensory signals to trigger a voluntary movement.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reduction of somatosensory evoked fields in the primary somatosensory cortex in a one-back task.

Authors:  Ralph Huonker; Thomas Weiss; Wolfgang H R Miltner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Active attention modulates passive attention-related neural responses to sudden somatosensory input against a silent background.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Kosuke Akatsuka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Centrifugal regulation of a task-relevant somatosensory signal triggering voluntary movement without a preceding warning signal.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Kosuke Akatsuka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Somatosensory off-response in humans: an ERP study.

Authors:  Koya Yamashiro; Koji Inui; Naofumi Otsuru; Tetsuo Kida; Kosuke Akatsuka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The impact of light fingertip touch on haptic cortical processing during a standing balance task.

Authors:  David A E Bolton; William E McIlroy; W Richard Staines; W Richard Staines
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Intermodal auditory, visual, and tactile attention modulates early stages of neural processing.

Authors:  Christina M Karns; Robert T Knight
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Looking inward: the mind's eye focuses on mental representations.

Authors:  George R Mangun
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.