Literature DB >> 7094679

Classification in young and retarded children: the primacy of overall similarity relations.

D G Kemler.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that young normal children use similarity relations as a predominant basis for classification, whereas older children use dimensional relations. Experiment 1 shows that similarity relations are systematically used by normal preschoolers and by retarded preadolescents for classification. Experiment 2 suggests that their tendency to use similarity relations is not merely a matter of preference, but that these children have difficulty learning to use dimensional relations. Still, experiment 3 demonstrates that dimensional relations have some psychological reality for preschoolers and for retarded children despite the dominance of overall similarity and despite the relative inaccessibility of dimensional relations. The research affords a finer specification of the development of classification skills and highlights the relation between intelligence and psychological stimulus structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7094679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  8 in total

Review 1.  Selective attention and attention switching: towards a unified developmental approach.

Authors:  Rima Hanania; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-07

2.  Rules and resemblance: their changing balance in the category learning of humans (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Justin J Couchman; Mariana V C Coutinho; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-04

3.  The influence of alcohol and loud music on analytic and holistic processing.

Authors:  T B Ward; S N Lewis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-02

4.  Classification behavior and measures of intelligence: dimensional identity versus overall similarity.

Authors:  T B Ward; B H Stagner; J G Scott; S T Marcus-Mendoza; D Turner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-01

5.  Individual differences in processing stimulus dimensions: relation to selective processing abilities.

Authors:  T B Ward
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-05

6.  The time course of explicit and implicit categorization.

Authors:  J David Smith; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Eric R Herberger; Joseph Boomer; Jessica L Roeder; F Gregory Ashby; Barbara A Church
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Implicit and explicit categorization: a tale of four species.

Authors:  J David Smith; Mark E Berg; Robert G Cook; Matthew S Murphy; Matthew J Crossley; Joseph Boomer; Brian Spiering; Michael J Beran; Barbara A Church; F Gregory Ashby; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Does language about similarity play a role in fostering similarity comparison in children?

Authors:  Seyda Ozçalişkan; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Dedre Gentner; Carolyn Mylander
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-06-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.