Literature DB >> 7093162

Rotational delivery of the fetus: Kielland's forceps and two other methods compared.

D L Healy, M A Quinn, R J Pepperell.   

Abstract

A retrospective comparison was undertaken of 552 cases in which Kielland's forceps were used for rotation and delivery, 95 cases in which other forceps were used for rotation and delivery, and 160 cases in which manual rotation and forceps were used. There was no significant difference in maternal or fetal morbidity between the three groups, regardless of whether the indication for delivery was delay in the second stage of labour or fetal distress. When Kielland's forceps were used by junior staff, significantly more vaginal and cervical lacerations and primary postpartum haemorrhage occurred, but there was no increase in fetal morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7093162     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb03648.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  4 in total

1.  Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study.

Authors:  Nivedita Gauthaman; Denise Henry; Irina Chis Ster; Azar Khunda; Stergios K Doumouchtsis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Should we abandon Kielland's forceps?

Authors:  L D Cardozo; D M Gibb; J W Studd; D J Cooper
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-07-30

3.  Kielland or Caesar?

Authors:  J O Drife
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-07-30

4.  Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Abigail R Aiken; Catherine E Aiken; Medhat S Alberry; Jeremy C Brockelsby; James G Scott
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 8.661

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.