Literature DB >> 7092395

Porcine cardiac xenograft valves: analysis of survival, valve failure, and explantation.

J M Craver, E L Jones, P McKeown, D K Bone, C R Hatcher, M Kandrach.   

Abstract

Porcine cardiac xenografts were used for cardiac valve replacement in 1,093 patients. Hospital mortality for aortic valve replacement (AVR) was 3.7%; for mitral valve replacement (MVR), 7.8%; and for AVR + MVR, 4.7%. Total follow-up was 2,036 patient-years; maximum, 7.3 years; and mean, 1.89 years. Actuarial survival (+/- standard error of the mean) for AVR was 84% +/- 2% at 56 months; for MVR, 84% +/- 3% at 56 months; and for AVR + MVR, 86% +/- 4% at 30 months. Nonfatal thromboembolism occurred in 8 of 1,030 patients (0.78%). Anticoagulation was not routinely employed. Fifty hospital survivors (4.8%) experienced valve dysfunction; 18 of the survivors (1.7%) died; and 32 of the survivors (3.1%) underwent reoperation. The rate of dysfunction increased slowly until the sixth year when an increased rate was observed (p less than 0.0001). Patients less than 34 years old had a higher incidence of dysfunction (p less than 0.01). Thirty-two hospital survivors (3.1%) underwent explantation of the porcine valve for late dysfunction. Valve dysfunction secondary to endocarditis and paravalvular leak occurred early, while leaflet deterioration or thrombosis was more gradual in onset and was noted later. The porcine valve has functioned well for 1 to 7 years with a low incidence of valve related morbidity and mortality without routine anticoagulation in patients older than 34 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7092395     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60846-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

1.  Clinical, hemodynamic, and operative descriptors affecting outcome of aortic valve replacement in elderly versus young patients.

Authors:  J M Craver; J Goldstein; E L Jones; W A Knapp; C R Hatcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Mitral replacement: clinical experience with a ball-valve prosthesis. Twenty-five years later.

Authors:  A Cobanoglu; G L Grunkemeier; G M Aru; C L McKinley; A Starr
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Double valve Implantation. Long-term evaluation of 8 different bioprostheses.

Authors:  P Stassano; V Mannacio; A Musumeci; A Golino; P Maida; V Ferrigno; G Buonocore; N Spampinato
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1991

4.  The bioprosthetic valve of choice for high-risk patients: long-term results (up to 10 years).

Authors:  P Stassano; C Gagliardi; L Matarazzo; A Musumeci; N Spampinato
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1985-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.