Literature DB >> 7091170

Evaluation and outcome of emergency room patients with transient loss of consciousness.

S C Day, E F Cook, H Funkenstein, L Goldman.   

Abstract

We identified 198 patients who presented to our emergency room with transient loss of consciousness. Seizures (29 percent of patients) and vasovagal/psychogenic episodes (40 percent of patients) were the most common presumptive causes of loss of consciousness, but the cause of loss of consciousness remained uncertain even at follow-up in 11 +/- 6 months in 13 percent of the patients. The history and physical examinations were sufficient for diagnosis in 85 percent of the patients in whom a diagnosis could be established. These data guided inpatient and outpatient with potentially dangerous causes of loss of consciousness except for one patient who had pulmonary embolism. In selected patient, diagnostic tests such as blood chemistries (three patients), electrocardiograms (four patients) electroencephalograms (three patients), and Holter monitoring (four patients) provided crucial information, and CT scans identified new brain tumors in four patients with focal neurologic presentations. At the time of follow-up, 7.5 percent of patients had suffered either major morbidity or death related to the cause of the index episode of loss of consciousness. Patients with cardiac causes represented a high risk (33 percent) group for such poor outcome, whereas patients who were under age 30, or who were under age 70 and had loss of consciousness on a vasovagal/psychogenic or unknown basis, constituted a low risk (1 percent) subgroup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7091170     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90913-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  79 in total

1.  Implantable loop recorder: evaluation of unexplained syncope.

Authors:  R A Kenny; A D Krahn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Important points in the clinical evaluation of patients with syncope.

Authors:  W Arthur; G C Kaye
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Current issues with prediction rules for syncope.

Authors:  Steve W Parry
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Patterns and preexisting risk factors of 30-day mortality after a primary discharge diagnosis of syncope or near syncope.

Authors:  Stephen F Derose; Gelareh Z Gabayan; Vicki Y Chiu; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  The utility of head computed tomography in the emergency department evaluation of syncope.

Authors:  Nikhil Goyal; Michael W Donnino; Ravi Vachhani; Ravi Bajwa; Tabassum Ahmad; Ronny Otero
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Transient loss of consciousness: the value of the history for distinguishing seizure from syncope.

Authors:  W A Hoefnagels; G W Padberg; J Overweg; E A van der Velde; R A Roos
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  Evaluation of syncope.

Authors:  M Yousuf Kanjwal; Blair P Grubb
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Syncope as a symptom of non-massive pulmonary embolism: a case report.

Authors:  Franca Dipaola; Isabella Cucchi; Nicola Filardo; Eleonora Carnovali; Nicola Montano; Raffaello Furlan; Giorgio Costantino
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

9.  Testing in syncope.

Authors:  Shamai A Grossman
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 10.  Epidemiology of reflex syncope.

Authors:  N Colman; K Nahm; K S Ganzeboom; W K Shen; J Reitsma; M Linzer; W Wieling; H Kaufmann
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.