Literature DB >> 22594351

Patterns and preexisting risk factors of 30-day mortality after a primary discharge diagnosis of syncope or near syncope.

Stephen F Derose1, Gelareh Z Gabayan, Vicki Y Chiu, Benjamin C Sun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The risk of short-term mortality after an emergency department (ED) visit for syncope is poorly understood, resulting in prognostic uncertainty and frequent hospital admission. The authors determined patterns and risk factors for short-term mortality after a diagnosis of syncope or near syncope to aid in medical decision-making.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of adult members of Kaiser Permanente Southern California seen at 11 EDs from 2002 to 2006 with a primary discharge diagnosis of syncope or near syncope (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] 780.2). The outcome was 30-day mortality. Proportional hazards time-to-event regression models were used to identify risk factors.
RESULTS: There were 22,189 participants with 23,951 ED visits, resulting in 307 deaths by 30 days. A relatively lower risk of death was reached within 2 weeks for ages 18 to 59 years, but not until 3 months or more for ages 60 and older. Preexisting comorbidities associated with increased mortality included heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 14.3 in ages 18 to 59 years, HR = 3.09 in ages 60 to 79 years, HR = 2.34 in ages 80 years plus; all p < 0.001), diabetes (HR = 1.49, p = 0.002), seizure (HR = 1.65, p = 0.016), and dementia (HR = 1.41, p = 0.034). If the index visit followed one or more visits for syncope in the previous 30 days, it was associated with increased mortality (HR = 1.86, p = 0.024). Absolute risk of death at 30 days was under 0.2% in those under 60 years without heart failure and more than 2.5% across all ages in those with heart failure.
CONCLUSIONS: The low risk of death after an ED visit for syncope or near syncope in patients younger than 60 years old without heart failure may be helpful when deciding who to admit for inpatient evaluation. The presence of one or more comorbidities that predict death and a prior visit for syncope should be considered in clinical decisions and risk stratification tools for patients with syncope. Close clinical follow-up seems advisable in patients 60 years and older due to a prolonged risk of death.
© 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22594351      PMCID: PMC3356934          DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01336.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  42 in total

1.  Characteristics and admission patterns of patients presenting with syncope to U.S. emergency departments, 1992-2000.

Authors:  Benjamin C Sun; Jennifer A Emond; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Syncope in the elderly.

Authors:  W Kapoor; D Snustad; J Peterson; H S Wieand; R Cha; M Karpf
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Prospective evaluation and outcome of patients admitted for syncope over a 1 year period.

Authors:  J-J Blanc; C L'Her; A Touiza; B Garo; E L'Her; J Mansourati
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Syncope in an elderly, institutionalised population: prevalence, incidence, and associated risk.

Authors:  L A Lipsitz; J Y Wei; J W Rowe
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1985-04

5.  Diagnostic and prognostic implications of recurrences in patients with syncope.

Authors:  W N Kapoor; J Peterson; H S Wieand; M Karpf
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Evaluation and outcome of emergency room patients with transient loss of consciousness.

Authors:  S C Day; E F Cook; H Funkenstein; L Goldman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Cost-effectiveness of in-hospital evaluation of patients with syncope.

Authors:  B Mozes; R Confino-Cohen; H Halkin
Journal:  Isr J Med Sci       Date:  1988-06

8.  A prospective evaluation and follow-up of patients with syncope.

Authors:  W N Kapoor; M Karpf; S Wieand; J R Peterson; G S Levey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-07-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Syncope of unknown origin. The need for a more cost-effective approach to its diagnosis evaluation.

Authors:  W N Kapoor; M Karpf; Y Maher; R A Miller; G S Levey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-21       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  A risk score to predict arrhythmias in patients with unexplained syncope.

Authors:  François P Sarasin; Barbara H Hanusa; Thomas Perneger; Martine Louis-Simonet; Anand Rajeswaran; Wishwa N Kapoor
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.451

View more
  3 in total

1.  Analysis of emergency department visits for palpitations (from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey).

Authors:  Marc A Probst; William R Mower; Hemal K Kanzaria; Jerome R Hoffman; Eric F Buch; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Association of corrected QT interval with long-term mortality in patients with syncope.

Authors:  Nivas Balasubramaniyam; Chandrasekar Palaniswamy; Wilbert S Aronow; Sahil Khera; Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian; Prakash Harikrishnan; Jay V Doshi; Christopher Nabors; Stephen J Peterson; Sachin Sule
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 3.  Predictors of Short-Term Outcomes after Syncope: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas A Gibson; Robert E Weiss; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.