Literature DB >> 7086500

Clinical recording of pressure on the spinal cord and cauda equina. Part 2: position changes in pressure on the cauda equina in central lumbar spinal stenosis.

B Magnaes.   

Abstract

To define the site, degree, and dynamics of mechanical compression of the spinal nerve roots, pressure was measured in 42 patients with clinical symptoms and myelographic findings indicating central lumbar spinal stenosis. Pathological pressure on the cauda equina was found in 67% of the patients. The pressure in the region of the spinal block was high during standing and walking, and in several patients exceeded mean arterial blood pressure. The block pressure was the main mechanical factor in the central part of the spinal canal causing pain and paresis. Elevated fluid pressure caudal to the block was an additional but usually subordinate factor. In 33% of the patients, normal pressure on the cauda equina was found, and lateral compression of multiple nerve roots seemed to be the only mechanical symptom-causing factor. Clinically, these patients could not be distinguished from patients with central compression. After laminectomy with decompression of the cauda equina, the field should be inspected for lateral narrowing which, if present, should be treated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7086500     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1982.57.1.0057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  8 in total

1.  Spinal claudication.

Authors:  C F Bolton
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results.

Authors:  J F Zucherman; K Y Hsu; C A Hartjen; T F Mehalic; D A Implicito; M J Martin; D R Johnson; G A Skidmore; P P Vessa; J W Dwyer; S Puccio; J C Cauthen; R M Ozuna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Specialist outreach clinics in general practice.

Authors:  J J Bailey; M E Black; D Wilkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-04-23

4.  Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS(®) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Jan Van Meirhaeghe; Patrick Fransen; Daniele Morelli; Niall J A Craig; Gregor Godde; Attila Mihalyi; Frederic Collignon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Long-term results with percutaneous interspinous process devices in the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Patrick Fransen
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

6.  Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics correlate with neurogenic claudication in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hyun-Ji Kim; Hakseung Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn; Keewon Kim; Dong-Joo Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  One-year follow-up of a series of 100 patients treated for lumbar spinal canal stenosis by means of HeliFix interspinous process decompression device.

Authors:  Alberto Alexandre; Andrea Maria Alexandre; Mario De Pretto; Luca Corò; Raul Saggini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  A double-blind, randomized controlled, prospective trial assessing the effectiveness of oral corticoids in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis.

Authors:  Luiz Claudio L Rodrigues; Jamil Natour
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2014-08-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.