Literature DB >> 7075189

The Prentif contraceptive cervical cap: acceptability aspects and their implications for future cap design.

J P Koch.   

Abstract

Patients in a private gynecological practice were offered the Prentif contraceptive cervical cap. The first 413 acceptors were sent a questionnaire covering in detail many of the aspects of their experience. The 371 responses contained a wealth of information concerned with safety, effectiveness and acceptability. Safety and effectiveness are dealt with in the companion article preceding, while the less serious risk factors that reduce the acceptability of the Prentif cap are presented and discussed herein. In order of descending frequency, these factors include: odor; difficulty removing; discomfort to partner; difficulty inserting; dislike of spermicide; discomfort to self; urinary discomforts; vaginal infections; vaginal discharge; and vaginal itching. The most attractive features of the cap, as compared with the diaphragm, were: increased convenience; greater safety; less interference with spontaneity; increased frequency of intercourse; and increased libido. Despite multiple problems with Prentif caps, 67.4% of the cap recipients were still using their caps after one year. However, this was among a select group of highly motivated women of above-average intelligence. The causes of cap acceptability problems are discussed along with probable future improvements in cap design that may solve them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Barrier Methods; Cervical Cap--side effects; Contraception; Contraception Continuation--statistics; Contraception Termination; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Contraceptive Usage; Developed Countries; Economic Factors; Evaluation; Evaluation Indexes; Family Planning; Method Acceptability; North America; Northern America; Quantitative Evaluation; Research And Development; Sex Behavior; Spermicidal Contraceptive Agents; Technology; United States; Vagina; Vaginal Barrier Methods--side effects; Vaginal Cream; Vaginal Spermicides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7075189     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(82)90027-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  2 in total

1.  The Use of the Cavity-Rim Cervical Cap in a Family Physician's Office.

Authors:  M Rev; V Gruson; W Latta
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Vaginal mechanical contraceptive devices.

Authors:  M Smith; B N Barwin
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.