Literature DB >> 6616379

Vaginal mechanical contraceptive devices.

M Smith, B N Barwin.   

Abstract

The alleged adverse effects of oral contraceptives and intrauterine devices have led to increased consumer and physician demand for vaginal contraceptive devices. The efficacy and the advantages and disadvantages of vaginal sponges, cervical caps and diaphragms are discussed and compared in this article.

Keywords:  Barrier Methods; Cervical Cap; Contraception; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Usage; Evaluation; Family Planning; Method Acceptability; Use-effectiveness; Vaginal Barrier Methods; Vaginal Diaphragm; Vaginal Sponge

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1983        PMID： 6616379      PMCID： PMC1875460     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Assoc J        ISSN： 0008-4409            Impact factor:   8.262


  15 in total

1.  Vaginal lesion: etiology--a malfitting diaphragm?

Authors:  M V Widhalm
Journal:  J Nurse Midwifery       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct

2.  Successful use of the diaphragm and jelly by a young population: report of a clinical study.

Authors:  M E Lane; R Arceo; A J Sobrero
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1976 Mar-Apr

3.  Contraceptive failure among married women in the United States, 1970-1973.

Authors:  B Vaughan; J Trussell; J Menken; E F Jones
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec

Review 4.  Barrier methods.

Authors:  L B Tyrer; L E Bradshaw
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1979-04

5.  Continuation and pregnancy rates with four contraceptive methods.

Authors:  R E Hall
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Nonprescription vaginal contraception.

Authors:  D A Edelman
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  Preliminary testing of the contraceptive collagen sponge.

Authors:  M Chvapil; W Droegemueller; K Betts; W Heine; L Weinstein
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Nursing protocol to improve the effectiveness of the contraceptive diaphragm.

Authors:  E Gara
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.412

9.  Customized cervical cap: evolution of an ancient idea.

Authors:  C Arthur
Journal:  J Nurse Midwifery       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec

10.  Increase in diaphragm use in a university population.

Authors:  L E Berlin; W H Dotterer; E S Henriques
Journal:  JOGN Nurs       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.