Literature DB >> 7071350

The choice of sedation for computed tomography in children: a prospective evaluation.

J R Thompson, S Schneider, S Ashwal, B S Holden, D B Hinshaw, A N Hasso.   

Abstract

A prospective study of 582 pediatric cranial computed tomographic (CT) examinations was made in order to determine the efficacy and safety of two sedation regimens and general anesthesia. Two hundred seventy-nine outpatients were randomly given oral chloral hydrate (80 mg/kg) or an intramuscular preparation composed of atropine, meperidine, promethazine, and secobarbital (AMPS). Three hundred three inpatients were randomly administered chloral hydrate, the AMPS, or endotracheal anesthesia. Intravenous supplementation of the sedation was limited by the protocol to a maximum secobarbital dosage of 2 mg/kg. An additional retrospective analysis was made of 316 scan attempts obtained outside the study during the same period. A failed CT examination was defined as one that could not be completed or one that showed motion artifacts on two or more scan pairs after two scan pair repeats. The failure rate was 15% for the chloral hydrate group and 12% for the AMPS group. No motion artifacts were present on 94% of the completed studies. There was no mortality, but major and minor complications occurred in 3.5% of the randomized group. It was concluded that each of the methods had proved acceptably safe and effective and that measures can be taken to decrease complications and sedation failures further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7071350     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.143.2.7071350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

Review 1.  The pediatric sedation service: who is appropriate to sedate, which medications should I use, who should prescribe the drugs, how do I bill?

Authors:  Keira P Mason
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-05

2.  Randomised double-blind clinical trial of intermediate- versus high-dose chloral hydrate for neuroimaging of children.

Authors:  L Martí-Bonmatí; C L Ronchera-Oms; C Casillas; C Poyatos; C Torrijo; N V Jiménez
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children.

Authors:  Choong Yi Fong; Chee Geap Tay; Lai Choo Ong; Nai Ming Lai
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-03

Review 4.  Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children.

Authors:  Choong Yi Fong; Wei Kang Lim; Limin Li; Nai Ming Lai
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-16

5.  Respiratory insufficiency following chloral hydrate sedation in two children with Leigh disease (subacute necrotizing encephalomyelopathy).

Authors:  S B Greenberg; E N Faerber
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1990

6.  Administration of oral chloral hydrate to paediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C L Ronchera; L Martí-Bonmatí; C Poyatos; J Vilar; N V Jiménez
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1992-12-11

7.  Combination effects of chloral hydrate and nitrous oxide/oxygen in the mouse staircase test.

Authors:  R J Pruhs; J H Kalbfleisch; R M Quock
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1988 May-Jun

8.  Comparing Two Different Doses of Intravenous Midazolam in Pediatric Sedation and Analgesia.

Authors:  Hassan Barzegari; Kambiz Masoumi; Hassan Motamed; Behzad Zohrevandi; Shima Zeynadini Meymand
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2016-11

9.  Oral Chloral Hydrate Compare with Rectal Thiopental in Pediatric Procedural Sedation and Analgesia; a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Reza Azizkhani; Soheila Kanani; Ali Sharifi; Keihan Golshani; Babak Masoumi; Omid Ahmadi
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2014
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.