Literature DB >> 7068909

Bone marrow processing and cryopreservation.

D C Linch, L J Knott, K G Patterson, D A Cowan, P G Harper.   

Abstract

Three different closed procedures for concentrating bone marrow progenitor cells prior to cryopreservation have been compared. These were by a manual double centrifugation method, a Hemonetics 30 cell separator and an Aminco Celltrifuge. The best results were achieved using the paediatric pheresis set on the Hemonetics model 30. Marrow was frozen in 120 ml aliquots in a programmed freezer with rapid cooling of the freezing chamber during the phase change from the liquid to the solid state. After freeze-thawing the average nucleated cell recovery was approximately 50% and the progenitor cell recovery 80%.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7068909      PMCID: PMC497493          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.35.2.186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  9 in total

1.  Technics of human-bone-marrow procurement by aspiration from living donors.

Authors:  R E WILSON
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1959-10-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Collection, storage, and administration of autologous human bone-marrow.

Authors:  D E PEGG; N H KEMP
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1960-12-31       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Stimulation by human placental conditioned medium of hemopoietic colony formation by human marrow cells.

Authors:  A W Burgess; E M Wilson; D Metcalf
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  The effect of cooling regimens on the transplantation potential of marrow.

Authors:  J P Lewis; M Passovoy; S A Conti; P A McFate; F E Trobaugh
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1967 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Human bone marrow colony growth in agar-gel.

Authors:  B L Pike; W A Robinson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 6.  The double barrier in bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  D W van Bekkum
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 3.851

7.  The processing of human bone marrow for cryopreservation and reinfusion.

Authors:  R S Weiner; J S Tobias; R A Yankee
Journal:  Biomedicine       Date:  1976

8.  Accelerated hemopoietic recovery following the infusion of cryopreserved autologous bone marrow in humans.

Authors:  F R Appelbaum; G Herzig; R G Graw; J L Zeigler
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Autologous bone-marrow transplantation in relapsed adult acute leukaemia.

Authors:  K A Dicke; A Zander; G Spitzer; D S Verma; L Peters; L Vellekoop; K B McCredie; J Hester
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-03-10       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  The processing of stem cell concentrates from the bone marrow in ABO-incompatible transplants: how and when.

Authors:  Nicola Daniele; Maria Cristina Scerpa; Cecilia Rossi; Alessandro Lanti; Gaspare Adorno; Giancarlo Isacchi; Francesco Zinno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Haematological recovery following high-dose cyclophosphamide with autologous bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  C Twelves; R Souhami; P Harper; A Goldstone
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Very high dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow rescue in adult patients with resistant relapsed lymphoma.

Authors:  C C Anderson; A H Goldstone; R L Souhami; D C Linch; P G Harper; K A McLennan; M Jones; S J Machin; A M Jelliffe; J C Cawley
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  High-dose cyclophosphamide with autologous marrow transplantation for small cell carcinoma of the bronchus.

Authors:  R L Souhami; P G Harper; D Linch; C Trask; A H Goldstone; J S Tobias; S G Spiro; D M Geddes; J D Richards
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.333

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.