Literature DB >> 7068691

A clinical study of the differences between the scoliotic angles measured on posteroanterior and anteroposterior radiographs.

A A DeSmet, J E Goin, M A Asher, H G Scheuch.   

Abstract

The scoliotic angles of 128 curves in seventy-eight patients were measured on paired anteroposterior and posteroanterior upright radiographs that had been made on the same day. The association between the difference in the measured angles and the various clinical and curve parameters was examined. The angles on the anteroposterior and posteroanterior radiographs were highly correlated (r = 0.96). The angles on the posteroanterior radiographs were larger than those on the anteroposterior radiographs by a mean of 2.4 degrees for the thoracic curves and 1.7 degrees for the lumbar curves. Only the thoracolumbar scoliotic angles measured essentially the same on the two radiographic projections. The magnitude of the difference between the two measured angles was not correlated with the age of the patient, the direction of the curve, the magnitude of the curve, or the degree of deformity in the sagittal plane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7068691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

Review 1.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Automatic quantification of spinal curvature in scoliotic radiograph using image processing.

Authors:  Anitha H; G K Prabhu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Accuracy and applicability of measurement of the scoliotic angle at the frontal plane by Cobb's method, by Ferguson's method and by a new method.

Authors:  K M Diab; J A Sevastik; R Hedlund; I A Suliman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; M A Hageman; W Keessen; R van der Meer; J C van Wieringen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Parameter variation in stable scoliosis.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; C Stengs; W Keessen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Reducing the radiation dosage in patients with a scoliosis.

Authors:  J P Lescrève; R P Van Tiggelen; J Lamoureux
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Reproducibility of standing posture for X-ray radiography: a feasibility study of the BalancAid with healthy young subjects.

Authors:  Dyah Ekashanti Octorina Dewi; Albert G Veldhuizen; Johannes G M Burgerhof; I Ketut Eddy Purnama; Peter M A van Ooijen; Michael H F Wilkinson; Tati Latifah Erawati Rajab Mengko; Gijsbertus Jacob Verkerke
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.934

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.