Literature DB >> 7055424

Prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times as preoperative screening tests.

J M Eisenberg, J R Clarke, S A Sussman.   

Abstract

Preoperative tests of coagulation function have been suggested to detect patients who are likely to have abnormal bleeding during and after surgery. A study was designed to determine the yield of prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT), both in discovering patients who are at risk for abnormal bleeding and in inducing changes in patient care or outcome. Of 750 patients on three surgical services, 611 (81%) patients had no indication of a bleeding disorder on history or physical examination. Of the 139 patients who had clinical indications, 25 (18.0%) patients had an abnormal PT or PTT. Of the 611 patients without clinical indications, 480 patients had the PT or PTT determined, and 13 (2.7%) patients had abnormal results. One (0.2%) of the 480 patients might have benefited from the test result (this patient required a second operation to control arterial bleeding). The prolonged PT or PTT was of no apparent clinical importance in the remaining 12 patients without indications of bleeding disorders preoperatively. The low yield of the PT and PTT in detecting unsuspected bleeding disorders preoperatively was further obscured by the larger number of apparently false-positive results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7055424     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380250030007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  13 in total

1.  Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy.

Authors:  A Manhire; M Charig; C Clelland; F Gleeson; R Miller; H Moss; K Pointon; C Richardson; E Sawicka
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Cost-effective management of colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  J A Heine; D A Rothenberger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Preoperative evaluation: the assessment and management of surgical risk.

Authors:  K Kroenke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  A prospective evaluation of the efficacy of preoperative coagulation testing.

Authors:  M J Rohrer; M C Michelotti; D L Nahrwold
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Pursuit of abnormal coagulation screening tests generates modest hidden preoperative costs.

Authors:  J B Bushick; J M Eisenberg; J Kinman; R D Cebul; J S Schwartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Rational preoperative evaluation.

Authors:  A D Muskett; J M McGreevy
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Safety of omitting routine bleeding tests prior to image-guided musculoskeletal core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Yuri Shif; Justin W Kung; Colm J McMahon; Jennifer Ni Mhuircheartaigh; Yu Ching Lin; Megan E Anderson; Jim S Wu
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The value of routine preoperative testing in the prediction of operative hemorrhage in adenotonsillectomy.

Authors:  Galila Zaher; Khaled Al-Noury
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-08-27

9.  The Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Preoperative Thrombocytopenia in Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery: An Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Luke J Matzek; Andrew C Hanson; Phillip J Schulte; Kimberly D Evans; Daryl J Kor; Matthew A Warner
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Modern Management of Bleeding, Clotting, and Coagulopathy in Trauma Patients: What Is the Role of Viscoelastic Assays?

Authors:  Sanjeev Dhara; Ernest E Moore; Michael B Yaffe; Hunter B Moore; Christopher D Barrett
Journal:  Curr Trauma Rep       Date:  2020-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.