Literature DB >> 7050694

Chromosomal rearrangement and carcinogenesis.

M Radman, P Jeggo, R Wagner.   

Abstract

All carcinogens that have been thoroughly tested have been found to induce some kind of chromosomal rearrangement. Chromosomal rearrangements are associated with a variety of human and rodent cancers and are associated, with in vitro cell transformation. The DNA from non-malignant cells can transform other non-malignant cells under conditions that may involve chromosomal rearrangement. These findings support the view that chromosomal rearrangement can be a step in carcinogenesis. Available evidence indicates that carcinogens can act to induce chromosomal rearrangement by creating or revealing sites on DNA for recombination, or by inducing or activating cellular systems resulting in a stimulation of recombination. Chromosomal rearrangement may affect carcinogenesis by altering gene expression. Perhaps by allowing the activation of cellular cancer genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7050694     DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(82)90035-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  13 in total

1.  Induction of duplication reversion in human fibroblasts, by wild-type and mutated SV40 T antigen, covaries with the ability to induce host DNA synthesis.

Authors:  M A Shammas; S J Xia; R J Shmookler Reis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  RAP80-directed tuning of BRCA1 homologous recombination function at ionizing radiation-induced nuclear foci.

Authors:  Yiduo Hu; Ralph Scully; Bijan Sobhian; Anyong Xie; Elena Shestakova; David M Livingston
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Plasmid mediated mutagenesis of a cellular gene in transfected eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  C R Brandt; F M Buonaguro; J K McDougall; D A Galloway
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-01-26       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Sequence rearrangements and genome instability. A possible step in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  M Chorazy
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Somatic cell fusion as a source of genetic rearrangement leading to metastatic variants.

Authors:  L Larizza; V Schirrmacher
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 9.264

6.  Stimulation of recombination between homologous sequences on plasmid DNA and chromosomal DNA in Escherichia coli by N-acetoxy-2-acetylaminofluorene.

Authors:  C Luisi-DeLuca; R D Porter; W D Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dysfunctional homologous recombination mediates genomic instability and progression in myeloma.

Authors:  Masood A Shammas; Robert J Shmookler Reis; Hemanta Koley; Ramesh B Batchu; Cheng Li; Nikhil C Munshi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Karyotypic progression in human tumors.

Authors:  S R Wolman
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 9.264

9.  Recombination and its roles in DNA repair, cellular immortalization and cancer.

Authors:  M A Shammas; R J Shmookler Reis
Journal:  Age (Omaha)       Date:  1999-04

10.  Persistence of chromosome rearrangements in peripheral lymphocytes from patients treated with melphalan for ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  B Lambert; K Holmberg; N Einhorn
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.