Literature DB >> 7039024

Advantage of cold storage over machine perfusion for preservation of cadaver kidneys.

G Opelz, P I Terasaki.   

Abstract

Evidence is provided that, with cold ischemia up to 48 hr and warm ischemia up to 60 min, simple storage preservation results in equally good or better transplant success rates than pulsatile machine perfusion. In the critical 24- to 43-hr preservation period, 1-year survival rates were 53 +/- 3% for 282 kidneys preserved in Collins solution, as compared with 40 +/- 2% for 565 kidneys on the Belzer machine (P less than 0.0001) and 48 +/- 1% for 1441 kidneys perfused on the Waters machine (P = not significant). Warm ischemia of 40 to 60 min also yielded better results with simple cold storage than with machine preservation (P less than 0.05). Although it has been maintained that one of the functions of preservation machines is to select out kidneys of poor quality, we found that this preselection actually has resulted in lower transplant survival rates. Because storage in Collins solution is simpler, safer, and much less expensive, we conclude that there is no longer any reason to preserve kidneys by pulsatile perfusion on machines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7039024     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198201000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  9 in total

Review 1.  Machine perfusion in solid organ transplantation: where is the benefit?

Authors:  Helge Bruns; Peter Schemmer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  National recommendations for donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada: Donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada.

Authors:  Sam D Shemie; Andrew J Baker; Greg Knoll; William Wall; Graeme Rocker; Daniel Howes; Janet Davidson; Joe Pagliarello; Jane Chambers-Evans; Sandra Cockfield; Catherine Farrell; Walter Glannon; William Gourlay; David Grant; Stéphan Langevin; Brian Wheelock; Kimberly Young; John Dossetor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Machine perfusion in abdominal organ transplantation: Current use in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Elsaline Rijkse; Jan Nm IJzermans; Robert C Minnee
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2020-01-18

4.  Use of two expanded-criteria-donor renal allografts in a single patient.

Authors:  Edmund Q Sanchez; Bernard V Fischbach; Gomathy Narasimhan; Srinath Chinnakotla; Dmitriy Nikitin; Tariq Khan; Henry B Randall; Gregory J McKenna; Richard Ruiz; Robert M Goldstein; Göran B Klintmalm; Marlon F Levy
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2007-07

Review 5.  Maximizing kidneys for transplantation using machine perfusion: from the past to the future: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmer M Hameed; Henry C Pleass; Germaine Wong; Wayne J Hawthorne
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Textbook Outcome as a Quality Metric in Living and Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Austin D Schenk; April J Logan; Jeffrey M Sneddon; Daria Faulkner; Jing L Han; Guy N Brock; William K Washburn
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.532

Review 7.  Non heart-beating donors in England.

Authors:  Eleazar Chaib
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 8.  Advances in Perfusion Systems for Solid Organ Preservation.

Authors:  Sara Salehi; Kenny Tran; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2018-09-21

9.  Hypothermic Machine Perfusion as a National Standard Preservation Method for Deceased Donor Kidneys.

Authors:  Aukje Brat; Kirsten M de Vries; Ernst W E van Heurn; Volkert A L Huurman; Wim de Jongh; Henri G D Leuvenink; Arjan D van Zuilen; Bernadette J J M Haase-Kromwijk; Jeroen de Jonge; Stefan P Berger; Sijbrand H Hofker
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.385

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.