Literature DB >> 7030384

Unfolding of lac repressor and its proteolytic fragment by urea: headpieces stabilize the core within lac repressor.

M Schnarr, J C Maurizot.   

Abstract

Circular dichroism measurements were used to compared the urea-induced unfolding transition of the lac repressor with those of its separated tryptic fragments, the tetrameric core, and the N-terminal headpiece. The presence of the headpieces covalently linked to the core in the intact repressor leads to a stabilization against urea denaturation as compared to that for the isolated core. This results in a shift of the midpoint of the transition by about 0.5 M urea. When the inducer isopropyl beta-D-thiogalactoside is bound, the core is stabilized more than the entire repressor. The isolated headpiece is considerably more stable against urea denaturation than the tryptic core or the lac repressor. The reversible denaturation process of the headpiece was quantitatively analyzed, and the free energy of unfolding in the absence of urea was found to be 2.4 or 2.9 kcal/mol, depending on the method of calculation used. Comparison between the circular dichroism spectra of the lac repressor, the tryptic core of the lac repressor, and the headpiece supply further evidence that there are no major conformational differences between the structural domains (core and headpieces) before and after proteolytic cleavage of the lac repressor. These results are discussed with respect to the contacts between the different domains of the protein. It is concluded that relatively weak interdomain contacts are probably responsible for the stabilization of the core by the covalently linked headpieces and that these contacts might be weakened upon binding of the inducer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7030384     DOI: 10.1021/bi00524a039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  5 in total

1.  Use of urea and glycine betaine to quantify coupled folding and probe the burial of DNA phosphates in lac repressor-lac operator binding.

Authors:  Jiang Hong; Mike W Capp; Ruth M Saecker; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  A LexA mutant repressor with a relaxed inter-domain linker.

Authors:  P Oertel-Buchheit; J Reinbolt; M John; M Granger-Schnarr; M Schnarr
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Perturbation of lac operator DNA modification by tryptic core protein from lac repressor.

Authors:  S P Manly; G N Bennett; K S Matthews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Radiation-induced oxidative damage to the DNA-binding domain of the lactose repressor.

Authors:  Nathalie Gillard; Stephane Goffinont; Corinne Buré; Marie Davidkova; Jean-Claude Maurizot; Martine Cadene; Melanie Spotheim-Maurizot
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  In vitro binding of LexA repressor to DNA: evidence for the involvement of the amino-terminal domain.

Authors:  S Hurstel; M Granger-Schnarr; M Daune; M Schnarr
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 11.598

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.