Literature DB >> 7024807

Antiemetic efficacy of high-dose metoclopramide: randomized trials with placebo and prochlorperazine in patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

R J Gralla, L M Itri, S E Pisko, A E Squillante, D P Kelsen, D W Braun, L A Bordin, T J Braun, C W Young.   

Abstract

In a study of the effectiveness of high intravenous doses of metoclopramide as an antiemetic, 41 patients with advanced cancer who were being treated with cisplatin were entered into two double-blind trials. In the first trial patients were randomly assigned to receive either metoclopramide or placebo, and in the second trial they received either metoclopramide or prochlorperazine. Patients given metoclopramide had significantly fewer episodes of emesis than patients given placebo (medians, 1.0 vs. 10.5; P = 0.001) or prochlorperazine (medians, 1.5 vs. 12.0; P = 0.005). Metoclopramide was superior to placebo and to prochlorperazine in reducing the volume of emesis (P = 0.001 and P = 0.022, respectively) and was more effective than placebo in shortening the duration of nausea (P = 0.042) and vomiting (P = 0.028). Side effects from metoclopramide were minor, with mild sedation frequently observed; one patient had a brief extrapyramidal reaction. We conclude that metoclopramide in high intravenous doses has greater antiemetic activity than placebo or prochlorperazine in patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7024807     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198110153051601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  160 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of antiemetic therapy.

Authors:  M Campbell; D N Bateman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Antiemetic study design: desirable objectives, stratifications and analyses.

Authors:  I N Olver
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1992-12

Review 3.  Myths and realities of antiemetic treatment.

Authors:  M Martin
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1992-12

Review 4.  Adverse effects of cancer chemotherapy. An overview of techniques for avoidance/minimisation.

Authors:  M Nicolson; R C Leonard
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Guidelines for the control of nausea and vomiting with chemotherapy of low or minimal emetic potential.

Authors:  Ian Olver; Rebecca A Clark-Snow; Enzo Ballatori; Birgitte T Espersen; Emilio Bria; Karin Jordan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Antiemetic activity of high-dose methylprednisolone associated with continuous-infusion metoclopramide and oral alprazolam during multiple-day chemotherapy.

Authors:  G Salles; E Archimbaud; X Thomas; D Fiere
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Why is the neurobiology of nausea and vomiting so important?

Authors:  Charles C Horn
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  A dose-finding study of granisetron, a novel antiemetic, in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Granisetron Study Group.

Authors:  M Soukop
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Antiemetics in cancer chemotherapy: historical perspective and current state of the art.

Authors:  M Tonato; F Roila; A Del Favero; E Ballatori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.