Literature DB >> 7023696

Differential translation efficiency explains discoordinate expression of the galactose operon.

C Queen, M Rosenberg.   

Abstract

We have used an mRNA-dependent E. coli S-30 translation system to compare the translation efficiencies of two polycistronic transcripts of the galactose operon, the CRP-cAMP-dependent mRNA (P1) and the CRP-cAMP-independent mRNA (P2). The RNAs were prepared in vitro, quantitated by hybridization or gel analysis and translated in a cell free system. The specific protein products were measured, and their quantities were compared with the amount of input mRNA. Our results show that the P2 mRNA synthesizes epimerase, the 5'-proximal gene product of the gal operon, four times more efficiently than the P1 mRNA. The 5'-distal gene products, transferase and kinase, are translated with the same efficiency from both transcripts. Thus the ratio of epimerase to kinase synthesis is four times higher for the P2 mRNA than for the P1 mRNA. This change in epimerase to kinase ratio is identical to that observed in vivo when the cellular cAMP level falls and gal transcription is believed to switch from P1 to P2. We suggest that it is the differential translation efficiency of the epimerase gene on the two different gal transcripts that accounts for this discoordinate expression. Moreover, since the P2 mRNA differs from the P1 mRNA only by the addition of five nucleotides at the 5' terminus and these nucleotides are outside the ribosome binding region we determine for epimerase, the selective difference in the translation efficiency of epimerase is probably mediated by RNA conformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7023696     DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90249-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  25 in total

1.  Secondary structure of the ribosome binding site determines translational efficiency: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  M H de Smit; J van Duin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Melibiose is hydrolyzed exocellularly by an inducible exo-alpha-galactosidase in Azotobacter vinelandii.

Authors:  T Y Wong
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Gene organization and structure of the Streptomyces lividans gal operon.

Authors:  C W Adams; J A Fornwald; F J Schmidt; M Rosenberg; M E Brawner
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Translational regulatory signals within the coding region of the bacteriophage lambda cIII gene.

Authors:  S Altuvia; A B Oppenheim
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Differences in rates of tyrosine aminotransferase deinduction with cyclic AMP and glucocorticoids.

Authors:  E J Lewis; P Calie; W D Wicks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mutational alterations of translational coupling in the L11 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  F Sor; M Bolotin-Fukuhara; M Nomura
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Nucleotides flanking the promoter sequence influence the transcription of the yeast mitochondrial gene coding for ATPase subunit 9.

Authors:  T K Biswas; G S Getz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Role of mRNA translational efficiency in bovine growth hormone expression in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  B E Schoner; H M Hsiung; R M Belagaje; N G Mayne; R G Schoner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Spot 42 RNA mediates discoordinate expression of the E. coli galactose operon.

Authors:  Thorleif Møller; Thomas Franch; Christina Udesen; Kenn Gerdes; Poul Valentin-Hansen
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Initiation of transcription of the yeast mitochondrial gene coding for ATPase subunit 9.

Authors:  J C Edwards; K A Osinga; T Christianson; L A Hensgens; P M Janssens; M Rabinowitz; H F Tabak
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1983-12-10       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.