Literature DB >> 7020591

Impact of verification media and resuscitation on accuracy of the membrane filter total coliform enumeration technique.

T M Evans, R J Seidler, M W LeChevallier.   

Abstract

Verification of membrane filter total coliform colonies was compared in lauryl tryptose broth, and m-LAC broth primary media and brilliant green-lactose-bile broth and EC broth secondary media. Verification in m-LAC broth yielded the greatest number of aerogenic isolates for both untreated surface water and drinking water samples. Verification in brilliant green-lactose-bile broth increased the number of false-negative reactions. At least 90% of the isolates aerogenic in primary verification media and anaerogenic in brilliant green-lactose-bile broth were representative of the coliform genera. The addition of a resuscitation step in the membrane filter technique did not yield greater numbers of verified coliforms per sample. Verification of both typical and atypical colonies in m-LAC broth resulted in a 10-fold increase in coliform numbers from untreated surface water. With drinking water, verification of both colony types resulted in an increase from less than 1 coliform per 100 ml to greater than 1/100 ml. A single-step verification in m-LAC broth is proposed as a more rapid and sensitive coliform verification procedure than the standard technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7020591      PMCID: PMC243881          DOI: 10.1128/aem.41.5.1144-1151.1981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  9 in total

1.  Relationship of coliform bacteria to gas production in media containing lactose.

Authors:  C W CHAMBERS
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1950-05-12       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Pollution indicator bacteria associated with municipal raw and drinking water supplies.

Authors:  J A Clark; J E Pagel
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Synergistic false-positive coliform reaction on M-Endo MF medium.

Authors:  L J Schiff; S M Morrison; J V Mayeux
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1970-11

4.  Technical considerations in applying the membrane filter procedure.

Authors:  E E Geldreich; H L Jeter; J A Winter
Journal:  Health Lab Sci       Date:  1967-04

5.  Failure of the most-probable-number technique to detect coliforms in drinking water and raw water supplies.

Authors:  T M Evans; C E Waarvick; R J Seidler; M W LeChevallier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Study on the efficiency of four procedures for enumerating coliforms in water.

Authors:  B J Dutkaand; S E Tobin
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Fecal indicator bacteria persistence under natural conditions in an ice-covered river.

Authors:  C V Davenport; E B Sparrow; R C Gordon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparison of m-Endo LES, MacConkey, and Teepol media for membrane filtration counting of total coliform bacteria in water.

Authors:  W O Grabow; M du Preez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Coliform species recovered from untreated surface water and drinking water by the membrane filter, standard, and modified most-probable-number techniques.

Authors:  T M Evans; M W LeChevallier; C E Waarvick; R J Seidler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 4.792

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Comparison of fecal coliform agar and violet red bile lactose agar for fecal coliform enumeration in foods.

Authors:  A Leclercq; C Wanegue; P Baylac
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparison of membrane filter, multiple-fermentation-tube, and presence-absence techniques for detecting total coliforms in small community water systems.

Authors:  N J Jacobs; W L Zeigler; F C Reed; T A Stukel; E W Rice
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of verification procedures for the membrane filter total coliform technique.

Authors:  M W LeChevallier; S C Cameron; G A McFeters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Influence of diluents, media, and membrane filters on detection fo injured waterborne coliform bacteria.

Authors:  G A McFeters; S C Cameron; M W LeChevallier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Monensin-based medium for determination of total gram-negative bacteria and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J P Petzel; P A Hartman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Effect of noncoliforms on coliform detection in potable groundwater: improved recovery with an anaerobic membrane filter technique.

Authors:  S G Franzblau; B J Hinnebusch; L M Kelley; N A Sinclair
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Distribution of uidA gene sequences in Escherichia coli isolates in water sources and comparison with the expression of beta-glucuronidase activity in 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide media.

Authors:  M T Martins; I G Rivera; D L Clark; M H Stewart; R L Wolfe; B H Olson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Underestimation of total-coliform counts by the membrane filter verification procedure.

Authors:  J H Standridge; J J Delfino
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  New medium for improved recovery of coliform bacteria from drinking water.

Authors:  M W LeChevallier; S C Cameron; G A McFeters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Detection of Acinetobacter spp. in rural drinking water supplies.

Authors:  J M Bifulco; J J Shirey; G K Bissonnette
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.