Literature DB >> 7000124

Experimental chemotherapy studies: intercomparison of assays.

P R Twentyman.   

Abstract

In a limited number of experimental tumour systems the response to chemotherapy has been measured in terms of both cell survival and tumour growth delay. Both of these endpoints have complicating factors which lead to problems in interpretation of results. The time after drug administration at which cell survival is measured can be of predominant importance. If the time is too short, drug action may be incomplete and recovery from potentially lethal damage may still be occurring. If the time is too long, proliferation of surviving clonogenic cells may have begun. Tumour growth delay on the other hand is likely to be influenced by the effect of the chemotherapy on the host, as well as on the tumour. This may be particularly important when the tumour is significantly immunogenic. The rate of regenerative proliferation of the surviving clonogenic cells can be different following treatment with different cytotoxic drugs, hence resulting in different periods of growth delay from the same initial level of cell killing. Also some agents appear to be significantly cytostatic, producing considerable growth delay in the absence of cell killing. New data are also presented for the RIF-1 tumour and for multicellular tumour spheroids of the EMT6/Ca/VJAC line.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7000124      PMCID: PMC2149247     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl        ISSN: 0306-9443


  14 in total

1.  Stem-cell survival and tumor control in the Lewis lung carcinoma.

Authors:  G G Steel; K Adams
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  A simplified method for production and growth of multicellular tumor spheroids.

Authors:  J M Yuhas; A P Li; A O Martinez; A J Ladman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Changes of cell proliferation characteristics in a rat rhabdomyosarcoma before and after x-irradiation.

Authors:  A F Hermens; G W Barendsen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  The gross and cellular response of a rat mammary tumour to single doses of cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  J V Moore; B Dixon
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Sensitivity to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(4-methylcyclohexyl)-1-nitrosourea of the EMT6 tumor in vivo as determined by both tumor volume response and in vitro plating assay.

Authors:  P R Twentyman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Tumour volume response, initial cell kill and cellular repopulation in B16 melanoma treated with cyclophosphamide and 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea.

Authors:  T C Stephens; J H Peacock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  An artefact in clonogenic assays of bleomycin cytotoxicity.

Authors:  P R Twentyman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Sensitivity to cytotoxic agents of the EMT6 tumour in vivo: tumour volume versus in vitro plating. 1. Cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  P R Twentyman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Cell yield and cell survival following chemotherapy of the B16 melanoma.

Authors:  T C Stephens; J H Peacock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Repopulation of gamma-irradiated Lewis lung carcinoma by malignant cells and host macrophage progenitors.

Authors:  T C Stephens; G A Currie; J H Peacock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

1.  Chemosensitivity testing of primary human renal cell carcinoma by a tetrazolium based microculture assay (MTT).

Authors:  G Mickisch; S Fajta; G Keilhauer; E Schlick; R Tschada; P Alken
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1990

Review 2.  Predictive tests in cancer chemotherapy. A reappraisal.

Authors:  R Osieka; S Seeber; C G Schmidt
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1984-03-01

Review 3.  Tumor hypoxia: its impact on cancer therapy.

Authors:  J E Moulder; S Rockwell
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 4.  Multicellular spheroids. A review on cellular aggregates in cancer research.

Authors:  W Mueller-Klieser
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Responses of a murine B16 melanoma to pharmacotherapy studied and compared with different assay systems.

Authors:  Y Kuwashima; O Matsubara; T Kasuga
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Predictive chemosensitivity testing.

Authors:  P R Twentyman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Response to chemotherapy of EMT6 spheroids as measured by growth delay and cell survival.

Authors:  P R Twentyman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The response of tumour cells to radiation and cytotoxic drugs--a comparison of clonogenic and isotope uptake assays.

Authors:  P R Twentyman; G A Walls; K A Wright
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Response of murine tumours to combinations of CCNU with misonidazole and other radiation sensitizers.

Authors:  D W Siemann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Cell subpopulations dispersed from solid tumours and separated by centrifugal elutriation.

Authors:  D W Siemann; E M Lord; P C Keng; K T Wheeler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.