Literature DB >> 6993431

Comparison of the sensitivity of the indirect, antibody-conjugated and the triple-bridge immunoperoxidase methods for immunohistochemical detection of carcinoembryonic antigen.

R M Sharkey, F J Primus, D M Goldenberg.   

Abstract

A comparison between two immunoperoxidase staining procedures, a triple-bridge and an indirect, antibody-conjugated method, was made to determine the relative sensitivity of each technique in the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in routine tissue sections. The enzyme-antibody conjugates for the indirect procedure were prepared according to the method of Nakane and Kawaoi (1974). The indirect, antibody-conjugated method, proved to be slightly more sensitive than the triple-bridge by two criteria. First, CEA could be localized using higher dilutions of the primary antiserum by the indirect technique, and secondly, tissues were shown to stain for CEA in specimens with lower tissue CEA levels by the indirect procedure than by the triple-bridge method. The preparation of enzyme-antibody conjugates is a relatively simple procedure and, in addition, the conjugates will remain stable when kept frozen or at 4 degrees C. Background staining due to non-specific interaction of the conjugate with the tissue can be eliminated easily by incubation with normal serum. These results indicate that the indirect, antibody-conjugated method can be used to enhance the staining of CEA in routine tissue sections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6993431     DOI: 10.1007/bf00493243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histochemistry        ISSN: 0301-5564


  13 in total

1.  Enzyme-labeled antibodies: preparation and application for the localization of antigens.

Authors:  P K Nakane; G B Pierce
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  Enzyme-labeled antibodies for the light and electron microscopic localization of tissue antigens.

Authors:  P K Nakane; G B Pierce
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 3.  Immunoperoxidase detection of carcinoembryonic antigen: an overview.

Authors:  F J Primus; R M Sharkey; H J Hansen; D M Goldenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  A shorter immunoperoxidase technique for the demonstration of carcinoembryonic antigen and other cell products.

Authors:  E Heyderman; A M Neville
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Peroxidase-labeled antibody. A new method of conjugation.

Authors:  P K Nakane; A Kawaoi
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  The unlabeled antibody enzyme method of immunohistochemistry: preparation and properties of soluble antigen-antibody complex (horseradish peroxidase-antihorseradish peroxidase) and its use in identification of spirochetes.

Authors:  L A Sternberger; P H Hardy; J J Cuculis; H G Meyer
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Background staining and sensitivity of the unlabelled antibody-enzyme (PAP) method. Comparison with the peroxidase labelled antibody sandwich method using formalin fixed paraffin embedded material.

Authors:  J Burns
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1975-06-05

8.  Carcinoembryonic antigen in histopathology: immunoperoxidase staining of conventional tissue sections.

Authors:  D M Goldenberg; R M Sharkey; F J Primus
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  A highly sensitive method for the demonstration of carcinoembryonic antigen in normal and neoplastic colonic tissue.

Authors:  C Wagener; H Csaszar; V Totović; H Breuer
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1978-11-24

10.  Affinity in radioimmunoassay of antibody cross-reactive with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and colon carcinoma antigen-III (CCA-III).

Authors:  F J Primus; E S Newman; H J Hansen
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.422

View more
  3 in total

1.  The role of transforming growth factor-beta in suppression of hepatic metastasis from colon cancer.

Authors:  Chandrakanth Are; Neka Simms; Ashwani Rajput; Ashwani Rajupt; Michael Brattain
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Sensitivity and efficiency of four immunohistochemical methods as defined by staining of artificial sections.

Authors:  K Valnes; P Brandtzaeg; T O Rognum
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1984

3.  Transforming growth factor-β suppresses metastasis in a subset of human colon carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Neka A K Simms; Ashwani Rajput; Elizabeth A Sharratt; Melanie Ongchin; Carol A Teggart; Jing Wang; Michael G Brattain
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.