Literature DB >> 6986970

Alternating noncross-resistant combination chemotherapy and active nonspecific immunotherapy with BCG or MER-BCG for advanced breast carcinoma.

G R Blumenschein, G N Hortobagyi, S P Richman, J U Gutterman, C K Tashima, A U Buzdar, M A Burgess, R B Livingston, E M Hersh.   

Abstract

One hundred fifty-six evaluable patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with vincristine, Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide alternating at fixed intervals with 5-FU and methotrexate. Immunotherapy with BCG or MER-BCG was administered to all patients in two consecutive treatment programs. Overall objective response rate and complete response rate were 67% and 20%, respectively. These were not significantly different between the two immunotherapeutic groups. The median time to progression was sixteen-and-a-half months from initiation of therapy. The median survival of all patients was 21 months and that of responders was 26 months. Response rates, time to progression, and survival showed no significant advantage over a recent historical control group treated with FAC-BCG. Toxicity related to the gastrointestinal tract and bone marrow was considerably higher in this protocol than in the FAC combinations. MER at the dose, route, and schedule administered in this protocol caused excessive local and systemic toxic reactions. The alternate use of these noncross-resistant combinations in advanced breast cancer is not superior to combination chemotherapy used in the traditional manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6986970     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800215)45:4<742::aid-cncr2820450422>3.0.co;2-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of therapy with methanol extraction residue of BCG (MER).

Authors:  E M Hersh; J Quesada; S G Murphy; J U Gutterman; R D Hutchins
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 6.968

2.  Prednimustine combined with mitoxantrone and 5-fluorouracil for first and second-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  H Samonigg; H Stöger; A K Kasparek; M Schmid; J Dusleag; K Pfeiffer; M Smola; P Steindorfer; P Lechner
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Radiographic evaluation of therapeutic response in bony metastases of breast cancer.

Authors:  H I Libshitz; G N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  A comparison of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, vincristine, and prednisone (CMFVP) in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  R V Smalley; J Lefante; A Bartolucci; J Carpenter; C Vogel; S Krauss
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Cancer immunotherapy: the role regulatory T cells play and what can be done to overcome their inhibitory effects.

Authors:  Ulf Petrausch; Christian H Poehlein; Shawn M Jensen; Chris Twitty; James A Thompson; Ilka Assmann; Sachin Puri; Michael G LaCelle; Tarsem Moudgil; Levi Maston; Kevin Friedman; Sarah Church; Elisa Cardenas; Daniel P Haley; Edwin B Walker; Emmanuel Akporiaye; Andrew D Weinberg; Sidney Rosenheim; Todd S Crocenzi; Hong-Ming Hu; Brendan D Curti; Walter J Urba; Bernard A Fox
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.222

Review 6.  Chemotherapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  L S Perlow; J F Holland
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1984
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.