Literature DB >> 6400037

Chemotherapy of breast cancer.

L S Perlow, J F Holland.   

Abstract

Carcinoma of the breast will prove fatal to over 37,000 women in the United States in 1983, despite attempts at early diagnosis. Hormonal manipulation, known to provide effective palliation for many years, can now be effectively aimed at receptor positive women who have a 50-70% chance of responding. Newer agents, such as tamoxifen and aminoglutethimide offer the benefits of older treatments with less morbidity. Investigations of drugs acting at the level of the central nervous system are ongoing. Single agent chemotherapy is clearly effective in causing tumor regression, but effective combination chemotherapy provides more responses and a longer duration of response. The most effective combination regimens at present contain doxorubicin. Pharmacologic studies at the cellular level can be expected to provide more effective combinations. The most effective way to combine hormonal and chemotherapeutic treatments is not known. In receptor positive women without life-threatening disease, beginning with hormonal treatment may be effective in providing palliation at low toxic cost without jeopardizing overall survival. New efforts to cure clinically manifest metastatic breast cancer may eschew palliation as a prime goal. Techniques of synchronizing and of stimulating breast cancer to increase its susceptibility to cytotoxic drugs are under investigation. Immunotherapy is not established as a beneficial modality in the treatment of breast cancer, although levamisole has led to suggestive benefit in small controlled trials. The use of chemotherapy, and possibly of some hormonal treatments in appropriate patients, as an adjuvant to surgery prolongs disease-free survival. This approach, using established chemotherapeutic and hormonal agents when the metastatic disease is subclinical, is consonant with abundant evidence from experimental systems and other human cancers that are curable. Expectation of curing human breast cancer will likely require aggressive action at the time when the total body tumor burden is at a minimum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6400037     DOI: 10.1007/BF02934139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother        ISSN: 0736-0118


  168 in total

1.  Combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone and 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  H Y Yap; L Esparza; G R Blumenschein; G N Hortobagyi; G P Bodey
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 12.111

2.  A randomized trial of aminoglutethimide versus tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  A Lipton; H A Harvey; R J Santen; A Boucher; D White; A Bernath; R Dixon; G Richards; A Shafik
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Dose-response effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A possible new approach to the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: massive doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Authors:  F Pannuti; A Martoni; G R Lenaz; E Piana; P Nanni
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1978-04

5.  A randomized comparative trial of adriamycin versus methotrexate in combination drug therapy.

Authors:  J M Bull; D C Tormey; S H Li; P P Carbone; G Falkson; J Blom; E Perlin; R Simon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Enhanced 5-fluorouracil nucleotide formation after methotrexate administration: explanation for drug synergism.

Authors:  E Cadman; R Heimer; L Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-09-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  R G Cooper; J F Holland; O Glidewell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Oral high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP) in treatment of advanced breast cancer. A preliminary report of clinical and experimental studies.

Authors:  M Izuo; Y Iino; K Endo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  The contribution of recent NSABP clinical trials of primary breast cancer therapy to an understanding of tumor biology--an overview of findings.

Authors:  B Fisher; C Redmond; E R Fisher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A phase II evaluation of m-AMSA, 4'-(9-acridinylamino) methanesulfon-m-anisidide, in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  V E Currie; J Howard; R Wittes
Journal:  Cancer Clin Trials       Date:  1981
View more
  4 in total

1.  High-dose ifosfamide and mesna in advanced breast cancer. A phase II study.

Authors:  F Sanchiz; A Milla
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Phase II study of mitoxantrone for liver metastases from breast cancer.

Authors:  S M O'Reilly; R E Coleman; R D Rubens
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Failure of mitomycin-vindesine combination chemotherapy as salvage treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  A Ardizzoni; P Pronzato; L Canobbio; R Lionetto; R Rosso
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  The current and future place of vinorelbine in cancer therapy.

Authors:  E Cvitkovic; J Izzo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.