Literature DB >> 6982112

Accuracy of serial myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with thallium-201 for prediction of graft patency early and late after coronary artery bypass surgery. A controlled prospective study.

M Pfisterer, H Emmenegger, H E Schmitt, J Müller-Brand, J Hasse, E Grädel, M B Laver, D Burckhardt, F Burkart.   

Abstract

To assess the accuracy of serial myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with thallium-201 (201Tl) to predict graft patency early and late coronary artery bypass surgery, rest and exercise 201Tl and coronary arteriography were performed preoperatively and 2 weeks and 1 year after operation. The scintigraphic results were compared with graft patency, symptoms, left ventricular function and physical work capacity in a consecutive series of 55 patients with a total of 154 grafts. Serial 201Tl had an 80% sensitivity, 88% specificity and 86% overall accuracy in detecting or excluding graft occlusion, which was predicted by reversible ischemia as well as persistent "new scar" segments. Occluded grafts were correctly localized by 201Tl scintigraphy in 61%. Postoperative apical 201Tl defects were frequent (two-thirds of cases), and were the result of intraoperative transapical venting of the left ventricle. After coronary bypass graft surgery, ejection fraction at rest was unchanged. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and physical work capacity improved significantly. In the presence of new perfusion defects detected postoperatively, physical work capacity was reduced significantly. New 201Tl defects in addition to typical or atypical angina provided a high probability of graft occlusion, while in the absence of new 201Tl defects all grafts were patent in more than 90% of patients, all of whom had no or only atypical chest pain. We conclude that serial 201Tl imaging after coronary artery bypass surgery is an accurate noninvasive method that can be used routinely to assess graft function, to localize spatially occluded grafts and to identify patients with a high likelihood of graft occlusion who may need invasive studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6982112     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.66.5.1017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  8 in total

1.  Exercise technetium 99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography late after coronary artery bypass surgery: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  A Desideri; G Candelpergher; P Zanco; G Suzzi; R Terlizzi; N Borsato; G Colangeli; C Daskalakis; F Chierichetti; L Celegon
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Nonangiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency.

Authors:  W Stanford; J R Galvin; B H Thompson; M Grover-McKay; D J Skorton
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993-06

3.  Assessment of aortocoronary bypass grafting using exercise ST segment/heart rate relation.

Authors:  M M Kardash; R M Boyle; D A Watson; J B Stoker; D A Mary; R J Linden
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1984-04

Review 4.  Myocardial perfusion imaging: clinical experience and recent progress in radionuclide scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J T Keijer; J J Bax; A C van Rossum; F C Visser; C A Visser
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-10

5.  Dobutamine-atropine stress myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging in the diagnosis of graft stenosis after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  A Elhendy; R T van Domburg; J J Bax; P R Nierop; R Valkema; M L Geleijnse; J D Kasprzak; A F Liqui-Lung; J H Cornel; J R Roelandt
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Different mechanisms for the relief of angina after coronary bypass surgery. Physiological versus anatomical assessment.

Authors:  P Ribeiro; M Shea; J E Deanfield; C M Oakley; R Sapsford; T Jones; R Walesby; A P Selwyn
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1984-11

Review 7.  Non-invasive Ischaemia Testing in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Technical Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Andreas Seraphim; Kristopher D Knott; Joao B Augusto; Katia Menacho; Sara Tyebally; Benjamin Dowsing; Sanjeev Bhattacharyya; Leon J Menezes; Daniel A Jones; Rakesh Uppal; James C Moon; Charlotte Manisty
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-23

8.  Comparison of coronary CT angiography versus functional imaging for CABG patients: A resource utilization analysis.

Authors:  Gary R Small; Fernanda Erthal; Ali Alenazy; Yeung Yam; Michael Edwards; Andrew Crean; Rob S Beanlands; Terrence D Ruddy; Benjamin J W Chow
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2020-03-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.