Literature DB >> 6979286

Binocular counterrolling during sustained body tilt in normal humans and in a patient with unilateral vestibular nerve section.

S G Diamond, C H Markham, N Furuya.   

Abstract

Two normal persons and a patient with unilateral vestibular nerve section were held motionless for ten minutes in the upright position, at 60 degrees tilt right ear down, and at 60 degrees tilt left ear down. In addition, one normal subject was held for ten minutes at each of 30, 60, and 90 degrees tilt left ear down. Photographs were taken of both eyes every ten seconds. Measurements of ocular counterrolling during these trials revealed torsional eye movements in all positions, including the upright, even though the head and body were stationary. Variations in torsion in the upright position ranged up to 2.75 degrees. At the tilt positions, variations ranged up to 4 degrees. Disconjugate movements were seen in all subjects in all positions. There were no significant differences in measurements of ocular counterrolling during static tilt between the normal subjects and the patient with the vestibular nerve section, in contrast to measures obtained during slow velocity dynamic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6979286     DOI: 10.1177/000348948209100222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  10 in total

1.  Human ocular torsion during parabolic flights: an analysis with scleral search coil.

Authors:  B S Cheung; K Money; I Howard; N Kirienko; W Johnson; J Lackner; P Dizio; J Evanoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Modern vestibular function testing.

Authors:  R W Baloh; J M Furman
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-01

3.  Antihysteresis of perceived longitudinal body axis during continuous quasi-static whole-body rotation in the earth-vertical roll plane.

Authors:  M Tatalias; C J Bockisch; G Bertolini; D Straumann; A Palla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visually guided adjustments of body posture in the roll plane.

Authors:  A A Tarnutzer; C J Bockisch; D Straumann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The history of the scientific elucidation of ocular counterrolling.

Authors:  H J Simonsz
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-11-15       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Temporal constancy of perceived direction of gravity assessed by visual line adjustments.

Authors:  A A Tarnutzer; D P Fernando; A Kheradmand; A G Lasker; D S Zee
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Human ocular counterroll: assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scleral coil recordings.

Authors:  H Collewijn; J Van der Steen; L Ferman; T C Jansen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Modulation of internal estimates of gravity during and after prolonged roll-tilts.

Authors:  Alexander A Tarnutzer; Giovanni Bertolini; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Sarah Marti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Otolithic Receptor Mechanisms for Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials: A Review.

Authors:  Ian S Curthoys; J Wally Grant; Ann M Burgess; Chris J Pastras; Daniel J Brown; Leonardo Manzari
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Prolonged Static Whole-Body Roll-Tilt and Optokinetic Stimulation Significantly Bias the Subjective Postural Vertical in Healthy Human Subjects.

Authors:  Andrea Wedtgrube; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.003

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.