Literature DB >> 6970507

Chronic cerebellar stimulation for cerebral palsy--five-year study.

R Davis, G Barolat-Romana, H Engle.   

Abstract

Two hundred sixty-two patients were implanted with cerebellar stimulator systems since February 1974. Cerebral Palsy (CP) patients constituted 88% (230) of this series. The age range was 3 to 53 years with 70% under 20 years of age. Half the CP series were severely affected with the rest being moderately to mildly involved. Athetosis was present in 50%. The primary effect of CCS has been a lowering of spastic muscle tone in 90% of the patients. Improvements in control of immature reflexes such as startle response, head control, scissoring, balance and sitting occur in the first month. Athetosis progressively decreases to a 50% level. In the moderate mild CP group abilities improve over the first six months leading to better feeding, dressing, and ambulation with clearer speech and less drooling. After six months, 25 of 48 patients were out of wheelchairs, walking. A further 47 patients were ambulating better. No deaths from surgery. Five have died during the 5 years from other causes. Eleven patients (4%) have had infected systems. Equipment problems especially with malfunctioning radio receivers (40%) have served as blind controls--spasticity returning and abilities decreasing. Replacements with another receiver or with a totally implantable lithium powered pacemaker (May 1979) have lead to a return of benefits. Post-mortem findings indicate the low current levels (0.8 uC/sqcm) applied intermittently produced no appreciable damage to the cerebellar cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6970507     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-8592-6_39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien)


  5 in total

Review 1.  Neurosurgical intervention during resistant phase of motor development of cerebral palsied.

Authors:  A K Purohit; I Dinakar
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Biopsy and post-mortem findings in a patient receiving cerebellar stimulation for epilepsy.

Authors:  G D Wright; R O Weller
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Calibration of clinical cerebellar and deep brain stimulation systems.

Authors:  D L McLellan; G D Wright; F Renouf
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 4.  Expanding therapeutic options: devices and the treatment of refractory epilepsy.

Authors:  Steven Karceski; Paul Mullin
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 5.  Consensus Paper: Experimental Neurostimulation of the Cerebellum.

Authors:  Lauren N Miterko; Kenneth B Baker; Jaclyn Beckinghausen; Lynley V Bradnam; Michelle Y Cheng; Jessica Cooperrider; Mahlon R DeLong; Simona V Gornati; Mark Hallett; Detlef H Heck; Freek E Hoebeek; Abbas Z Kouzani; Sheng-Han Kuo; Elan D Louis; Andre Machado; Mario Manto; Alana B McCambridge; Michael A Nitsche; Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib; Traian Popa; Masaki Tanaka; Dagmar Timmann; Gary K Steinberg; Eric H Wang; Thomas Wichmann; Tao Xie; Roy V Sillitoe
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.847

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.