Literature DB >> 15217548

Expanding therapeutic options: devices and the treatment of refractory epilepsy.

Steven Karceski1, Paul Mullin.   

Abstract

Alternative treatments to anticonvulsants and resective surgery are needed for patients with refractory epilepsy. The renewed interest in brain stimulation and device therapy is exciting and is based on expanding human and animal research. Many important questions remain, such as where and how the stimuli should be applied. If we assume that neural networks are responsible for seizure generation and propagation, it seems reasonable to assume that seizures can be affected by electrical stimulation of more than one brain region. As research continues, we may discover that stimulation of a particular brain region is more effective for a specific type of epilepsy. In addition to finding the ideal site for treatment, the optimum stimulation parameters must be defined. We may find that different brain regions require different stimulation parameters. Presently, the Vagus Nerve Stimulator is the only alternative treatment to anticonvulsive drugs or surgery that is currently available. However, as technology advances and our understanding of epilepsy grows, we are likely to see increasingly sophisticated devices. Some of these devices may have the capacity to accurately detect seizures and to respond with the most appropriate type of stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15217548     DOI: 10.1007/s11910-004-0059-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep        ISSN: 1528-4042            Impact factor:   5.081


  54 in total

1.  Left vagus nerve stimulation with the neurocybernetic prosthesis has complex effects on heart rate and on its variability in humans.

Authors:  M G Frei; I Osorio
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.864

2.  Vagus nerve stimulation for medication-resistant generalized epilepsy. E04 VNS Study Group.

Authors:  D Labar; J Murphy; E Tecoma
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-04-22       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  The effect of vagal afferent stimulation on the EEG pattern of the cat.

Authors:  A ZANCHETTI; S C WANG; G MORUZZI
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1952-08

4.  High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus suppresses absence seizures in the rat: comparison with neurotoxic lesions.

Authors:  L Vercueil; A Benazzouz; C Deransart; K Bressand; C Marescaux; A Depaulis; A L Benabid
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.045

5.  Mastering the nonlinear brain.

Authors:  J Glanz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Preliminary evaluation of cerebellar stimulation by double-blind stimulation and biological criteria in the treatment of epilepsy.

Authors:  J M Van Buren; J H Wood; J Oakley; F Hambrecht
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Significance of Purkinje cell density in seizure suppresion by chronic cerebellar stimulation.

Authors:  R K Rajjoub; J H Wook; J M Van Buren
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  The impact of epilepsy from the patient's perspective II: views about therapy and health care.

Authors:  R S Fisher; B G Vickrey; P Gibson; B Hermann; P Penovich; A Scherer; S G Walker
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 9.  Cerebellar stimulation for cerebral palsy spasticity, function, and seizures.

Authors:  R Davis
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.235

10.  Effects of vagus nerve stimulation on amino acids and other metabolites in the CSF of patients with partial seizures.

Authors:  E Ben-Menachem; A Hamberger; T Hedner; E J Hammond; B M Uthman; J Slater; T Treig; H Stefan; R E Ramsay; J F Wernicke
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.