Literature DB >> 6961973

Role of the host in the variable chemotherapeutic response of advanced Ridgway osteogenic sarcoma.

J A Nelson, J A Hokanson, V K Jenkins.   

Abstract

It is axiomatic that a given dose of an antitumor agent will not produce the same effect in 100% of the treated subjects. Numerous explanations regarding the sources of this heterogeneous response to drugs have been offered; however, there is a scarcity of experimental data allowing critical evaluation of the sources of variance. It is possible to study heterogeneous antitumor drug response in experimental, inbred animals. One animal model system, the advanced Ridgway osteogenic sarcoma, exhibits marked variation in its response to maximally tolerated doses of a number of clinically active antitumor agents. To evaluate the role of the host in the variable drug response, the tumor was bilaterally implanted into the flank regions of recipient AKR male mice. Treatment of the advanced tumor (200 mg-1,500 mg) with maximally tolerated doses of vincristine or L-phenylalanine mustard produced marked, but variable antitumor responses. Evaluation of a number of quantal and graded parameters of the chemotherapeutic response suggested that host heterogeneity contributes to variability. The host contribution was more apparent in this experiment model when the agent was noncurative. The underlying biological basis for the host heterogeneity is not known; however, it appears likely that pharmacological, immunological or other differences between the inbred animals account for the heterogeneity. Identification of these factors may be experimentally feasible in this animal model and help in the design of future studies in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6961973     DOI: 10.1007/BF00257743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  14 in total

1.  PERSPECTIVES IN CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY: THERAPEUTIC DESIGN.

Authors:  H E SKIPPER
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Combination chemotherapy for spontaneous AKR lymphoma.

Authors:  F M Schabel; H E Skipper; M W Trader; W R Laster; J B Cheeks
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep 2       Date:  1974-03

3.  On the presence within tumours of clones that differ in sensitivity to cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  L Håkansson; C Tropé
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A       Date:  1974-01

4.  Differential sensitivites of human melanoma cells grown in vitro to arabinosylcytosine.

Authors:  S C Barranco; D H Ho; B Drewinko; M M Romsdahl; R M Humphrey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Favorable factors in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  J T Carpenter; W A Maddox; H L Laws; D D Wirtschafter; S J Soong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  The practical benefits of pharmacokinetics in the use of antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  C Erlichman; R C Donehower; B A Chabner
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Concepts for controlling drug-resistant tumor cells.

Authors:  F M Schabel; H E Skipper; M W Trader; W R Laster; T H Corbett; D P Griswold
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Effect of Corynebacterium parvum on the response to irradiation of a C3H fibrosarcoma.

Authors:  H D Suit; R Sedlacek; M Wagner; L Orsi; V Silobrcic; K J Rothman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Heterogeneity in drug sensitivity among tumor cell subpopulations of a single mammary tumor.

Authors:  G H Heppner; D L Dexter; T DeNucci; F R Miller; P Calabresi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Mechanism of natural resistance of rat ascites hepatomas to 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine.

Authors:  I Abe; S Sato; M Watanabe; H Sato
Journal:  Gan       Date:  1978-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  Mechanisms of resistance to 6-thioguanine in a murine pancreatic tumor.

Authors:  B F Pan; T S Priebe; J A Nelson
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Changing metastatic patterns of a transplantable rat osteosarcoma.

Authors:  F Wingen; E Weber
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1987 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Intrinsic resistance to anticancer agents in the murine pancreatic adenocarcinoma PANC02.

Authors:  T S Priebe; E N Atkinson; B F Pan; J A Nelson
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Variability of tumor response to chemotherapy. II. Contribution of tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  L Simpson-Herren; P E Noker; S D Wagoner
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Variability of tumor response to chemotherapy. I. Contribution of host heterogeneity.

Authors:  L Simpson-Herren; P E Noker; S D Wagoner
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  The influence of tumor size and environment on gene expression in commonly used human tumor lines.

Authors:  Michael A Gieseg; Michael Z Man; Nicholas A Gorski; Steven J Madore; Eric P Kaldjian; Wilbur R Leopold
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.