Literature DB >> 3690803

Variability of tumor response to chemotherapy. I. Contribution of host heterogeneity.

L Simpson-Herren1, P E Noker, S D Wagoner.   

Abstract

Host factors that might be associated with the variable response of tumors to effective chemotherapy were studied in B6C3F1 mice bearing transplanted mammary adenocarcinoma 16/C tumors and treated with melphalan. Tumor response ranged from regression to an unpalpable size to growth under treatment. That biochemical resistance of the cell population was not primarily responsible for the variability was demonstrated by passage of responsive and nonresponsive tumors into new hosts followed by treatment with melphalan. When the implanted subcutaneous tumor weighed 1.0 g or less (usually 12 to 13 days postimplant), both the plasma levels of melphalan and the variability in plasma levels were similar to those observed in tumor-free mice. With tumor progression beyond 1.0 g, an increase in mean plasma levels and in variability, but not in plasma half-life, was observed. A correlation between the dose of melphalan administered, the schedule, and the percentage of tumor responses was found. There was no correlation between the plasma levels in individual mice following a given dose of melphalan and subsequent tumor response. Also, there was no correlation between the plasma levels of melphalan in individual mice following the second, third or fourth treatment in a multiple-dose treatment schedule and the response of the tumor in that mouse to previous treatments. Prior therapy (1, 2 or 3 doses administered 4 days apart) either prevented the increase in plasma levels that occurred in mice bearing untreated advanced tumors or reduced the plasma level (and the variability) to approximately that found in tumor-free mice. Whether this was a direct result of the effects of melphalan on the host or an indirect result of tumor inhibition is not known. A similar study in tumor-free mice indicated that prior treatment had only minimal effects on subsequent plasma levels. These studies indicate that heterogeneity of the host was not a major factor in variable tumor response if therapy was initiated when the tumors weighed 1.0 g or less.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3690803     DOI: 10.1007/bf00262580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  34 in total

1.  Experimental evaluation of potential anticancer agents. IV. Host weight loss as it relates to false positives in drug evaluation.

Authors:  W R LASTER; F M SCHABEL; H E SKIPPER; W S WILCOX; J R THOMSON
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Cachexia, the metabolic component of neoplastic diseases.

Authors:  G Costa
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Impairement of drug metabolism in tumor-bearing animals.

Authors:  R Rosso; M G Donelli; G Franchi; S Garattini
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Plasma half-life of cytosine arabinoside (NSC-63878) in patients treated for acute myeloblastic leukemia.

Authors:  B C Baguley; E M Falkenhaug
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1971-06

5.  The treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma with o,p'-DDD: prognostic implications of serum level monitoring.

Authors:  H van Slooten; A J Moolenaar; A P van Seters; D Smeenk
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-01

6.  Adriamycin distribution in plasma and blood cells of cancer patients with altered hematocrit.

Authors:  E Piazza; M Broggini; A Trabattoni; N Natale; A Libretti; M G Donelli
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1981-10

7.  Pharmacokinetics of the absorption, distribution, and elimination of melphalan in the dog.

Authors:  R L Furner; R K Brown; G Duncan
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1977-12

8.  Pharmacokinetics of cytosine arabinoside in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  A L Harris; C Potter; C Bunch; J Boutagy; D J Harvey; D G Grahame-Smith
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  A comparative study of the influence of malignant tumor on host metabolism in mice and man: evaluation of an experimental model.

Authors:  K Lundholm; S Edström; L Ekman; I Karlberg; A C Bylund; T Scherstén
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  In vitro degradation of L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM).

Authors:  T L Evans; S Y Chang; D S Alberts; I G Sipes; K Brendel
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  2 in total

1.  Distribution of nitroimidazoles and L-phenylalanine mustard in mammary adenocarcinoma 16/C tumors.

Authors:  P E Noker; L Simpson-Herren; S D Wagoner
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Variability of tumor response to chemotherapy. II. Contribution of tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  L Simpson-Herren; P E Noker; S D Wagoner
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.333

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.