Literature DB >> 6957162

In vitro antibacterial activity of fluorinated analogs of chloramphenicol and thiamphenicol.

V P Syriopoulou, A L Harding, D A Goldmann, A L Smith.   

Abstract

We evaluated the in vitro antimicrobial activity of Sch 24893, Sch 25298, and Sch 25393, three novel analogs of chloramphenicol and thiamphenicol. All of the analogs had minimal inhibitory concentrations of less than or equal to 10 micrograms/ml for 18 chloramphenicol-thiamphenicol-resistant strains of Shigella dysenteriae and 21 strains of resistant Salmonella typhi. The analogs were also more active than were chloramphenicol and thiamphenicol against chloramphenicol-resistant enteric bacteria, including six strains of Escherichia coli, seven strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae, and two strains of Enterobacter cloacae. Fifty-three strains of ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae were uniformly susceptible to chloramphenicol, thiamphenicol, and the three analogs. Sch 25298 was the most active compound tested (minimal inhibitory concentration, 0.5 microgram/ml for all strains). Four of seven chloramphenicol-thiamphenicol-resistant Haemophilus strains were susceptible to the fluorinated analogs. Of the three Haemophilus strains which were resistant to chloramphenicol, thiamphenicol, and the analogs, two contained less than 10% of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity of the strains which were resistant to only chloramphenicol and thiamphenicol. We conclude that fluorinated analogs of chloramphenicol and thiamphenicol have considerable in vitro activity against a broad spectrum of chloramphenicol-thiamphenicol-resistant, gram-negative bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6957162      PMCID: PMC181412          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.19.2.294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  7 in total

1.  Characterization and comparison of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase variants.

Authors:  Y Zaidenzaig; J E Fitton; L C Packman; W V Shaw
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1979-10-15

2.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.

Authors:  O H LOWRY; N J ROSEBROUGH; A L FARR; R J RANDALL
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Structure-activity relationship of chloramphenicols.

Authors:  C Hansch; K Nakamoto; M Gorin; P Denisevich; E R Garret; S M Heman-Ackah; C H Won
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  The enzymatic acetylation of chloramphenicol by the multiple drug-resistant Escherichia coli carrying R factor.

Authors:  Y Suzuki; S Okamoto
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1967-10-25       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  On the mechanism of action of chloramphenicol in protein synthesis.

Authors:  C Coutsogeorgopoulos
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1966-10-24

6.  The problems of drug-resistant pathogenic bacteria. Comparative enzymology of chloramphenicol resistance.

Authors:  W V Shaw
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1971-06-11       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Hemophilus influenzae type B susceptibility to 17 antibiotics.

Authors:  B B Emerson; A L Smith; A L Harding; D H Smith
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 4.406

  7 in total
  33 in total

1.  Detection of florfenicol resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolated from sick chickens.

Authors:  K Keyes; C Hudson; J J Maurer; S Thayer; D G White; M D Lee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of florfenicol following intravenous, intramuscular and oral administrations in rabbits.

Authors:  A M Abd El-Aty; A Goudah; K Abo El-Sooud; H Y El-Zorba; M Shimoda; H H Zhou
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Proposed MIC quality control guidelines for National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards susceptibility tests using seven veterinary antimicrobial agents: ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, penicillin G-novobiocin, pirlimycin, premafloxacin, and spectinomycin.

Authors:  S A Marshall; R N Jones; A Wanger; J A Washington; G V Doern; A L Leber; T H Haugen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Pharmacokinetics of florfenicol in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma of calves.

Authors:  B A de Craene; P Deprez; E D'Haese; H J Nelis; W Van den Bossche; P De Leenheer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Characterization of chloramphenicol and florfenicol resistance in Escherichia coli associated with bovine diarrhea.

Authors:  D G White; C Hudson; J J Maurer; S Ayers; S Zhao; M D Lee; L Bolton; T Foley; J Sherwood
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Chemistry of newer antibiotics directed toward overcoming bacterial resistance.

Authors:  L A Mitscher
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1987-04

7.  Post-transcriptional regulation of chloramphenicol acetyl transferase.

Authors:  W H Byeon; B Weisblum
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Effects of florfenicol on the immune responses and the interferon-inducible genes in broiler chickens under the impact of E. coli infection.

Authors:  Ola Hassanin; Fatma Abdallah; Ashraf Awad
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.459

9.  Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium DT104 isolated from humans, United States, 1985, 1990, and 1995.

Authors:  Efrain M Ribot; Rachel K Wierzba; Frederick J Angulo; Timothy J Barrett
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Pharmacokinetics of florfenicol in healthy pigs and in pigs experimentally infected with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.

Authors:  Jianzhong Liu; Ki-Fai Fung; Zhangliu Chen; Zhenling Zeng; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.