Literature DB >> 12543702

Pharmacokinetics of florfenicol in healthy pigs and in pigs experimentally infected with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.

Jianzhong Liu1, Ki-Fai Fung, Zhangliu Chen, Zhenling Zeng, Jie Zhang.   

Abstract

A comparative in vivo pharmacokinetic study of florfenicol was conducted in 18 crossbred pigs infected with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae following intravenous (i.v.), intramuscular (i.m.), or oral (p.o.) administration of a single dose of 20 mg/kg. The disease model was confirmed by clinical signs, X rays, pathohistologic examinations, and organism isolation. Florfenicol concentrations in plasma were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with UV detection at a wavelength of 223 nm. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by using the MCPKP software (Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, Lanzhou, China). The disposition of florfenicol after a single i.v. bolus was described by a two-compartment model with values for the half-life at alpha phase (t(1/2alpha)), the half-life at beta phase (t(1/2beta)), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0- infinity )), and the volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)) of 0.37 h, 2.91 h, 64.86 micro g. h/ml, and 1.2 liter/kg, respectively. The concentration-time data fitted the one-compartment (after i.m.) and two-compartment (after p.o.) models with first-order absorption. The values for the maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)), t(1/2alpha), t(1/2beta), and bioavailability after i.m. and p.o. dosing were 4.00 and 8.11 micro g/ml, 0.12 and 3.91 h, 13.88 and 16.53 h, and 122.7 and 112.9%, respectively, for the two models. The study showed that florfenicol was absorbed quickly and completely, distributed widely, and eliminated slowly in the infected pigs, and there was no statistically significant difference between the pharmacokinetic profiles for the infected and healthy pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12543702      PMCID: PMC151723          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.820-823.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  13 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of florfenicol in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma of calves.

Authors:  B A de Craene; P Deprez; E D'Haese; H J Nelis; W Van den Bossche; P De Leenheer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacokinetics of florfenicol after treatment of pigs with single oral or intramuscular doses or with medicated feed for three days.

Authors:  J Voorspoels; E D'Haese; B A De Craene; C Vervaet; D De Riemaecker; P Deprez; H Nelis; J P Remon
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1999-10-02       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  A comparative study on the inhibitory actions of chloramphenicol, thiamphenicol and some fluorinated derivatives.

Authors:  M Cannon; S Harford; J Davies
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Actinobacillus (Haemophilus) pleuropneumoniae isolated from pigs with pleuropneumonia.

Authors:  S Suzuki; K Ohmae; K Ohishi; M Muramatsu; T Takahashi
Journal:  Nihon Juigaku Zasshi       Date:  1989-04

5.  In vitro antibacterial activity of fluorinated analogs of chloramphenicol and thiamphenicol.

Authors:  V P Syriopoulou; A L Harding; D A Goldmann; A L Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pharmacokinetics of florfenicol following intravenous and intramuscular doses to cattle.

Authors:  R D Lobell; K J Varma; J C Johnson; R A Sams; D F Gerken; S M Ashcraft
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.786

7.  In vitro activity of chloramphenicol and thiamphenicol analogs.

Authors:  H C Neu; K P Fu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Florfenicol in non-lactating dairy cows: pharmacokinetics, binding to plasma proteins, and effects on phagocytosis by blood neutrophils.

Authors:  K N Bretzlaff; C A Neff-Davis; R S Ott; G D Koritz; B K Gustafsson; L E Davis
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.786

9.  Pharmacokinetics of florfenicol in veal calves.

Authors:  K J Varma; P E Adams; T E Powers; J D Powers; J F Lamendola
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.786

10.  Tissue concentrations and pharmacokinetics of florfenicol in male veal calves given repeated doses.

Authors:  P E Adams; K J Varma; T E Powers; J F Lamendola
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.156

View more
  9 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of florfenicol following intravenous, intramuscular and oral administrations in rabbits.

Authors:  A M Abd El-Aty; A Goudah; K Abo El-Sooud; H Y El-Zorba; M Shimoda; H H Zhou
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Pharmacokinetics of tilmicosin in healthy pigs and in pigs experimentally infected with Haemophilus parasuis.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Li Zhao; Yonghong Liu; Junfeng Liu; Xianqiang Li
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-31       Impact factor: 1.672

3.  In vitro and in vivo Synergistic Effects of Florfenicol and Thiamphenicol in Combination Against Swine Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida.

Authors:  Porjai Rattanapanadda; Hung-Chih Kuo; Thomas W Vickroy; Chi-Hsuan Sung; Tirawat Rairat; Tsai-Lu Lin; Sze-Yu Yeh; Chi-Chung Chou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Randomized field trial comparing the efficacy of florfenicol and oxytetracycline in a natural outbreak of calf pneumonia using lung reaeration as a cure criterion.

Authors:  Stan Jourquin; Jade Bokma; Lieze De Cremer; Katharina van Leenen; Nick Vereecke; Bart Pardon
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  An Interactive Generic Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (igPBPK) Modeling Platform to Predict Drug Withdrawal Intervals in Cattle and Swine: A Case Study on Flunixin, Florfenicol, and Penicillin G.

Authors:  Wei-Chun Chou; Lisa A Tell; Ronald E Baynes; Jennifer L Davis; Fiona P Maunsell; Jim E Riviere; Zhoumeng Lin
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.109

6.  PK-PD Integration Modeling and Cutoff Value of Florfenicol against Streptococcus suis in Pigs.

Authors:  Zhixin Lei; Qianying Liu; Shuaike Yang; Bing Yang; Haseeb Khaliq; Kun Li; Saeed Ahmed; Abdul Sajid; Bingzhou Zhang; Pin Chen; Yinsheng Qiu; Jiyue Cao; Qigai He
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in Commensal Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Joren De Smet; Filip Boyen; Siska Croubels; Geertrui Rasschaert; Freddy Haesebrouck; Patrick De Backer; Mathias Devreese
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  The prevalence of amphenicol resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs in mainland China from 2000 to 2018: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhe Du; Mengya Wang; Guanyi Cui; Xiangyang Zu; Zhanqin Zhao; Yun Xue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Synovial and Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Florfenicol and PK/PD Integration against Streptococcus suis in Pigs.

Authors:  Zoltán Somogyi; Patrik Mag; Dóra Kovács; Ádám Kerek; Pál Szabó; László Makrai; Ákos Jerzsele
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 6.321

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.