Literature DB >> 693234

Comparison of eye movements over faces in photographic positives and negatives.

S M Luria, M S Strauss.   

Abstract

Eye movements were recorded while subjects viewed ordinary portraits and photographic negatives of those portraits. Under both conditions they first studied sixteen portraits and then tried to decide which of forty-eight portraits they had just seen. They made more errors of recognition while viewing negatives, and their fixation patterns were significantly altered: there was a decrease in the percentage of fixations directed to the eyes, nose, and mouth, and an increase for such details as the ears, cheeks, chin, cap, and necktie. There was also a decrease in the ratio of fixations to the most fixated detail compared to the least fixated detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 693234     DOI: 10.1068/p070349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

1.  Evoked potential evidence for human brain mechanisms that respond to single, fixated faces.

Authors:  D A Jeffreys; E S Tukmachi; G Rockley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Guided saccades modulate object and face-specific activity in the fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  James P Morris; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  The application of eye-tracking technology in the study of autism.

Authors:  Zillah Boraston; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The face inversion effect is not a consequence of aberrant eye movements.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; John M Henderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

5.  Controlled scanpath variation alters fusiform face activation.

Authors:  James P Morris; Kevin A Pelphrey; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  What interests them in the pictures?--differences in eye-tracking between rhesus monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Ying-Zhou Hu; Hui-Hui Jiang; Ci-Rong Liu; Jian-Hong Wang; Cheng-Yang Yu; Synnöve Carlson; Shang-Chuan Yang; Veli-Matti Saarinen; Joshua D Rizak; Xiao-Guang Tian; Hen Tan; Zhu-Yue Chen; Yuan-Ye Ma; Xin-Tian Hu
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 5.203

7.  Eye movements are functional during face learning.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Carrick C Williams; Richard J Falk
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01

Review 8.  Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: the core of social cognition.

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Magali Batty
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Goedele van Belle; Meike Ramon; Philippe Lefèvre; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-06-17

Review 10.  How does gaze to faces support face-to-face interaction? A review and perspective.

Authors:  Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.