Literature DB >> 6891368

Rates of trisomies 21, 18, 13 and other chromosome abnormalities in about 20 000 prenatal studies compared with estimated rates in live births.

D M Schreinemachers, P K Cross, E B Hook.   

Abstract

Data were analyzed on the results of 19675 prenatal cytogenetic diagnoses reported to two chromosome registries on women aged 35 or over for whom there was no known cytogenetic risk for a chromosome abnormality except parental age. The expected rates at amniocentesis of 47, + 21; 47, + 18; 47, + 13; XXX; XXY; XYY; and other clinically significant cytogenetic defects by maternal age were obtained from a regression analysis on the observed rates, using a first degree exponential model. After an adjustment for maternal age, these rates were compared with previously estimated rates by maternal age in live births. The rates of 47, + 21 at amniocentesis and live birth are approximately parallel, with the latter about 80% of the amniocentesis rates. The rates of 47, + 18 at amniocentesis and live birth are approximately parallel, with the live birth rates about 30% of the amniocentesis rates, consistent with high fetal mortality of 47, + 18 after amniocentesis. The rates of 47, + 13 at amniocentesis indicate an increase in maternal age that is not as marked as that previously estimated in live births. The rates at amniocentesis for XXX and XXY increase with maternal age, with the rates of XXY almost identical to those estimated previously in live births, suggesting no late fetal mortality of XXY. The rates of XYY show a slight decrease with maternal age also consistent with little late fetal mortality of XYY. No consistent trend with age is seen for the pooled group of other clinically significant defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6891368     DOI: 10.1007/bf00276595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  10 in total

1.  Differences between rates of trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) and other chromosomal abnormalities diagnosed in livebirths and in cells cultured after second-trimester amniocentesis--suggested explanations and implications for genetic counseling and program planning.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1978

2.  Rates of trisomy 18 in livebirths, stillbirths, and at amniocentesis.

Authors:  E B Hook; D F Woodbury; S G Albright
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1979

3.  Midtrimester amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis. Safety and accuracy.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The Interregional Cytogenetic Register System (ICRS).

Authors:  G H Prescott; M L Rivas; L Shanbeck; D W Macfarlane; H E Wyandt; W R Breg; H A Lubs; R E Magenis; R L Summitt; C G Palmer; F Hecht; W Kimberling; D Clow
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1978

5.  Trisomy 13 (D1) syndrome: studies on parental age, sex ratio, and survival.

Authors:  R E Magenis; F Hecht; S Milham
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Rates of chromosome abnormalities at different maternal ages.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Temporal increase in the rate of Down syndrome livebirths to older mothers in New York State.

Authors:  E B Hook; P K Cross
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Parental age and birth order in the aetiology of some sex chromosome aneuploidies.

Authors:  A D Carothers; S Collyer; R De Mey; A Frackiewicz
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  Rates of 47, + 13 amd 46 translocation D/13 Patau syndrome in live births and comparison with rates in fetal deaths and at amniocentesis.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Down syndrome and recent demographic trends in Manitoba.

Authors:  J A Evans; A G Hunter; J L Hamerton
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 6.318

  10 in total
  14 in total

1.  The heteromorphic marker on chromosome 18 using restriction endonuclease AluI.

Authors:  A Babu; R S Verma
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Aneuploidy and skeletal health.

Authors:  Archana Kamalakar; John R Harris; Kent D McKelvey; Larry J Suva
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Extra structurally abnormal chromosomes (ESAC) detected at amniocentesis: frequency in approximately 75,000 prenatal cytogenetic diagnoses and associations with maternal and paternal age.

Authors:  E B Hook; P K Cross
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The relationship between maternal age and chromosome size in autosomal trisomy.

Authors:  N Risch; Z Stein; J Kline; D Warburton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  The genetics of human reproduction.

Authors:  A C Chandley
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1986-10-15

6.  Klinefelter's syndrome in Sardinia and Scotland. Comparative studies of parental age and other aetiological factors in 47,XXY.

Authors:  A D Carothers; G Filippi
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Exploration of spatial patterns of congenital anomalies in Los Angeles County using the vital statistics birth master file.

Authors:  Radhika Rible; Efren Aguilar; Angela Chen; Joshua L Bader; Leslie Goodyear-Moya; Karen Teekadai Singh; Suzanne E Paulson; Julie Friedman; Nilufar Izadpanah; Janet Pregler
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Maternal age-specific rates of 47,+21 and other cytogenetic abnormalities diagnosed in the first trimester of pregnancy in chorionic villus biopsy specimens: comparison with rates expected from observations at amniocentesis.

Authors:  E B Hook; P K Cross; L Jackson; E Pergament; B Brambati
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Changes in maternal age distribution and their possible impact on demand for prenatal diagnostic services.

Authors:  S Holloway; D J Brock
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-04-02

10.  The frequency of 47,+21,47,+18, and 47,+13 at the uppermost extremes of maternal ages: results on 56,094 fetuses studied prenatally and comparisons with data on livebirths.

Authors:  E B Hook; P K Cross; R R Regal
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.