Literature DB >> 3129116

Changes in maternal age distribution and their possible impact on demand for prenatal diagnostic services.

S Holloway1, D J Brock.   

Abstract

Between 1977 and 1985 there was a 65% increase in births to women aged 35 or more in England and Wales, but only a 15% increase in all births. Two factors of roughly equal importance were responsible for this differential increase. Firstly, the proportion of older women (35-44) among all women of reproductive age (15-44) increased from 28% in 1977 to 31% in 1985; and, secondly, in the same period the fertility rate for women aged 35-39 increased from 18.2 to 24.1 per 1000 and for women aged 40-44 from 4.1 to 4.6 per 1000. The increased fertility rate among older women is not due to an extension of the reproductive period but to a delay in childbearing. This delay was seen in women married only once and also in those who had remarried. As prenatal diagnosis for the exclusion of chromosome abnormalities is customarily offered to older mothers the increased numbers of women aged 35 or more and their increased fertility rate have important implications for the provision of obstetric and laboratory services. There were 51,859 live births to women aged 35 and over in 1985; the projected figure for 2001 is 85,000. If the use of prenatal diagnosis continues to increase facilities for about 70,000 prenatal cytogenetic analyses will be needed in 2001.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3129116      PMCID: PMC2545444          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.296.6627.978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  5 in total

1.  Cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis and its relative effectiveness in the Mersey Region and North Wales.

Authors:  S Walker; P J Howard
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Revised estimates and projections of Down syndrome births in the United States, and the effects of prenatal diagnosis utilization, 1970-2002.

Authors:  B A Goodwin; C A Huether
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Planning an amniocentesis service for Down syndrome.

Authors:  E Alberman; A C Berry; P E Polani
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-01-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Prenatal chromosome analysis and its impact on the birth incidence of chromosome disorders.

Authors:  M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  Rates of trisomies 21, 18, 13 and other chromosome abnormalities in about 20 000 prenatal studies compared with estimated rates in live births.

Authors:  D M Schreinemachers; P K Cross; E B Hook
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.132

  5 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Age limitation in human reproduction: is it justified?

Authors:  A Benshushan; J G Schenker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.412

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.