Literature DB >> 6887808

"Compensatory articulation" under conditions of reduced afferent information: a dynamic formulation.

J A Kelso, B Tuller.   

Abstract

A well-established feature of speech production is that talkers, faced with either anticipated or unanticipated perturbations, can spontaneously adjust the movement patterns of articulators such that the acoustic output remains relatively undistorted. Less clear is the nature of the underlying processes involved. In this study we examined five subjects' productions of the point vowels /i, a, u/ in isolation and of the same vowels embedded in a dynamic speech context under normal conditions and under a combined condition, in which (a) the mandible was fixed by means of a bite block; (b) proprioceptive information was reduced through bilateral anesthetization of the temporomandibular joint; (c) tactile information from the oral mucosa was reduced by application of a topical anesthetic; and (d) auditory information was masked by white noise. Minimal distortion of the formant patterns was found in the combined condition. These findings are unfavorable for central (e.g., predictive simulation) or peripheral closed-loop models, both of which require reliable peripheral information; they are more in line with recent work suggesting that movement goals may be achieved by muscle collectives that behave in a way that is qualitatively similar to a nonlinear vibratory system.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6887808     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2602.217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  11 in total

1.  The integration of large-scale neural network modeling and functional brain imaging in speech motor control.

Authors:  E Golfinopoulos; J A Tourville; F H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  What Acoustic Studies Tell Us About Vowels in Developing and Disordered Speech.

Authors:  Ray D Kent; Carrie Rountrey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Coupling dynamics in speech gestures: amplitude and rate influences.

Authors:  Pascal H H M van Lieshout
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Feedforward and feedback control in apraxia of speech: effects of noise masking on vowel production.

Authors:  Edwin Maas; Marja-Liisa Mailend; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Fingertip contact influences human postural control.

Authors:  J J Jeka; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  THE INFLUENCE OF LEXICAL FACTORS ON VOWEL DISTINCTIVENESS: EFFECTS OF JAW POSITIONING.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Nancy Pearl Solomon
Journal:  Int J Orofacial Myology       Date:  2016-11

Review 7.  Modulation, adaptation, and control of orofacial pathways in healthy adults.

Authors:  Meredith E Estep
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  Reflections on mirror neurons and speech perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Lotto; Gregory S Hickok; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  The Effect of Jaw Position on Perceptual and Acoustic Characteristics of Speech.

Authors:  Nancy Pearl Solomon; Matthew J Makashay; Benjamin Munson
Journal:  Int J Orofacial Myology       Date:  2016-11

10.  Mapping typical and hypokinetic dysarthric speech production network using a connected speech paradigm in functional MRI.

Authors:  Shalini Narayana; Megan B Parsons; Wei Zhang; Crystal Franklin; Katherine Schiller; Asim F Choudhri; Peter T Fox; Mark S LeDoux; Michael Cannito
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.