Literature DB >> 6883351

Clinical predictivity of transplantable tumor systems in the selection of new drugs for solid tumors: rationale for a three-stage strategy.

M J Staquet, D P Byar, S B Green, M Rozencweig.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to analyze the strategy used for the discovery of potentially clinically effective drugs by means of transplantable tumor systems in mice. With the present strategy used by the National Cancer Institute and the European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer, most new compounds are initially tested in the P388 leukemia model. Drugs showing activity in this prescreen are subsequently evaluated in a panel of eight screens (B16, CD8, Co38, L1210, LL, CX-1, LX-1, and MX-1). Positivity in any one of these screens qualifies a new drug for further preclinical studies leading to phase I-II clinical trial. Our analyses of the experimental screening data for 1949 compounds, and the comparison of results in humans and mice for 69 drugs that have been clinically evaluated against solid tumors, have indicated that the correlation of screening and clinical results is low and that a modified approach using four systems (P388, B16, L1210, and MX-1) would have been sufficient to uncover most of the drugs presently shown to be clinically active. In order to take advantage also of the information provided by other screens of the panel, a three-stage strategy can be used. In the first stage, compounds would be tested in the P388 prescreen, with a slightly higher level of response being required (T/C% greater than or equal to 125 instead of 120). In the second stage, prescreen-positive drugs would be tested in the B16, L1210, and MX-1 systems. Drugs positive in any one of these screens may then be tested in Co38, LL, and CX-1 to determine priorities for clinical study. For new chemical structures of particular promise, this third stage could be dropped. LX-1 and CD8 are not useful in this context. Such a strategy would be much more economical and faster than the automatic use of nine systems, and the resultant savings should permit the discovery of an increased number of potentially active compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6883351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep        ISSN: 0361-5960


  17 in total

Review 1.  Is the P388 murine tumor no longer adequate as a drug discovery model?

Authors:  T H Corbett; F A Valeriote; L H Baker
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Mouse models in oncogenesis and cancer therapy.

Authors:  M V Céspedes; I Casanova; M Parreño; R Mangues
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Postconfluency MDCK monolayers as an in vitro model of solid tumor chemosensitivity.

Authors:  P Skehan; J Thomas; S J Friedman
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.691

Review 4.  Predictive testing in cancer chemotherapy. I. In vivo.

Authors:  P H Slee; A T Van Oosterom; E A De Bruijn
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1985-06-21

Review 5.  Heterogeneity of human colon carcinoma.

Authors:  M G Brattain; A E Levine; S Chakrabarty; L C Yeoman; J K Willson; B Long
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 9.264

6.  Antitumor activity and mechanism of action of the marine compound girodazole.

Authors:  F Lavelle; A Zerial; C Fizames; B Rabault; A Curaudeau
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Activity of flavone acetic acid (NSC-347512) against solid tumors of mice.

Authors:  T H Corbett; M C Bissery; A Wozniak; J Plowman; L Polin; E Tapazoglou; J Dieckman; F Valeriote
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  Drug sensitivity of ten human tumor cell lines compared to mouse leukemia (L1210) cells.

Authors:  G J Badiner; R D Hamilton; L H Li; B K Bhuyan
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  Different response of murine and human mammary tumour models to a series of diastereoisomeric [1,2-bis(difluorophenyl) ethylenediamine]dichloroplatinum(II) complexes.

Authors:  T Spruss; G Bernhardt; E Schickaneder; H Schönenberger
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Adozelesin, a selected lead among cyclopropylpyrroloindole analogs of the DNA-binding antibiotic, CC-1065.

Authors:  L H Li; R C Kelly; M A Warpehoski; J P McGovren; I Gebhard; T F DeKoning
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.