Literature DB >> 3895154

Predictive testing in cancer chemotherapy. I. In vivo.

P H Slee, A T Van Oosterom, E A De Bruijn.   

Abstract

Several in vivo methods have been assessed for their capacity to predict sensitivity for anticancer agents in humans. Standard strategies have been developed for screening purposes. Adjustments of these strategies are frequently suggested in reports in which the correlation between assay results and clinical therapeutic efficacy is analysed. Low predictivity and high costs of these assays are important reasons for changing the screening strategy. In vivo methods which predict the clinical response in the individual patient, are under investigation. Only the results of the subrenal capsule assay (in normal mice) have been correlated with the clinical response in a larger study. The criticism of the method and the low predictivity for sensitivity in a prospective study provide no reason for optimism. Methods which study changes predicting the clinical response in patients are still in a developmental phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3895154     DOI: 10.1007/bf01968709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci        ISSN: 0167-6555


  40 in total

1.  Nitrogen mustard therapy; use of methyl-bis (beta-chloroethyl) amine hydrochloride and tris (beta-chloroethyl) amine hydrochloride for Hodgkin's disease, lymphosarcoma, leukemia and certain allied and miscellaneous disorders.

Authors:  L S GOODMAN; M M WINTROBE
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1946-09-21

2.  Human gastric choriocarcinoma serially transplanted in nude mice.

Authors:  T Kameya; Y Shimosato; M Tumuraya; N Ohsawa; T Nomura
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  DNA content in cells aspirated from carcinoma of the prostate treated with oestrogenic compounds.

Authors:  T B Kjaer; P Thommesen; P Frederiksen; P Bichel
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1979-12

4.  Selective activation of 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine by tumor cells as a basis for an improved therapeutic index.

Authors:  R D Armstrong; R B Diasio
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Experimental screening procedures and clinical predictability value.

Authors:  A Goldin; A A Serpick; N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-05

6.  Limitations of DNA histogram analysis by flow cytometry as a method of predicting chemosensitivity in a rat renal cancer model.

Authors:  R deVere White; A D Deitch; C A Olsson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Flow cytometric analysis of the response of the R3327-G rat prostatic adenocarcinoma to endocrine manipulation.

Authors:  A Pollack; C B Bagwell; N L Block; G L Irvin; A J Claflin; B J Stover
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Human myeloma marrow cells in immunologically deficient mice.

Authors:  D N Mitchell; R J Rees; A J Salsbury
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  An in vitro colony assay for human tumours grown in immune-suppressed mice and treated in vivo with cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  V D Courtenay; J Mills
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  The response to chemotherapy of a variety of human tumour xenografts.

Authors:  G G Steel; V D Courtenay; M J Peckham
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Eupatorium cannabinum L. A review emphasizing the sesquiterpene lactones and their biological activity.

Authors:  H J Woerdenbag
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1986-10-17

Review 2.  Predictive testing in cancer chemotherapy. II. In vitro.

Authors:  P H Slee; A T Van Oosterom; E A De Bruijn
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1985-08-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.