Literature DB >> 6881228

Long-term experience of general ultrasound screening in pregnancy.

P H Persson, S Kullander.   

Abstract

Since January 1, 1974, 43,000 routine ultrasound examinations have been performed on 22,400 pregnant women in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Malmö General Hospital. At the present time, one examination is performed in the seventeenth week of pregnancy and one in thirty-third week. At the first examination, the number of fetuses, fetal anatomy, cardiac activity, and placental site are indicated. Fetometry is performed. Gestational age is adjusted according to the value of the biparietal diameter. The second ultrasound examination is aimed at detecting fetal growth deviations and malformations. In 15% of all pregnancies, ultrasound corrected gestational age by more than 14 days. Ultrasound appeared to be superior to the clinical assessment in 88% of these discrepant pregnancies in predicting date of delivery. The early examination detected 98% of the twin pregnancies, with no false positive results. If an ultrasound examination had been performed within 3 weeks of delivery, 92% of the fetuses with growth retardation were detected. Altogether, the program detected 60% of the growth-retarded fetuses. In 0.4% of the examinations, malformations were detected (0.6% during the last 2 years). A cost-benefit analysis suggested that large economical gains are to be realized by screening. However, organizational and educational problems must be properly solved before general screening is offered to a healthy pregnant population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6881228     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90970-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Prescribing in pregnancy. Identifying abnormalities.

Authors:  M J Whittle; K P Hanretty
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-12-06

Review 2.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; James P Neilson; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

3.  Does routine ultrasound scanning improve outcome in pregnancy? Meta-analysis of various outcome measures.

Authors:  H C Bucher; J G Schmidt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-03

4.  Birth weight from pregnancies dated by ultrasonography in a multicultural British population.

Authors:  M Wilcox; J Gardosi; M Mongelli; C Ray; I Johnson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-04

5.  Effectiveness of routine ultrasonography in detecting fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population.

Authors:  L S Chitty; G H Hunt; J Moore; M O Lobb
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-09

6.  Prenatal detection of internal urinary system's anomalies. A registry-based study.

Authors:  C Stoll; Y Alembik; B Dott; M P Roth
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 7.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; Clare Mullan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-14

8.  Inter- and intra-observer variability in Sonographic measurements of the cross-sectional diameters and area of the umbilical cord and its vessels during pregnancy.

Authors:  Cristiane Barbieri; Jose G Cecatti; Carla E Souza; Emilio F Marussi; Jose V Costa
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.