Literature DB >> 6873017

The distinct health risk analyses required for genotoxic carcinogens and promoting agents.

J H Weisburger, G M Williams.   

Abstract

Health risk analysis needs to apply newer developments in the understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the carcinogenic process which has allowed for the classification of chemical carcinogens into those that damage genetic material directly (genotoxic carcinogens) and those that operate by indirect or epigenetic mechanisms. We propose a systematic decision point approach for detecting and evaluating substances for carcinogenic risk. This approach recognizes that genotoxic and epigenetic agents operate by different mechanisms and distinguishes between these two categories of carcinogens primarily on the basis of results in a battery of short-term tests that includes systems which reliably detect genotoxic carcinogens and others which may respond to epigenetic agents. Genotoxic carcinogens at very low dosages may have practical, effective threshold no-effect levels, but, nevertheless, because of their mechanism of action they are regarded as a qualitative hazard. The action of epigenetic agents of the promoter class is highly dose-dependent and reversible, and thus, a distinctively different health risk analysis is required for these agents to take account of their quantitatively lesser hazard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6873017      PMCID: PMC1569216          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8350233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  22 in total

1.  Carcinogenic risk assessment.

Authors:  J Cornfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Saccharin: an epigenetic carcinogen/mutagen?

Authors:  J Ashby; J A Styles; D Anderson; D Paton
Journal:  Food Cosmet Toxicol       Date:  1978-04

3.  Enhancement of oncogenesis in C3H/10T1/2 mouse embryo cell cultures by saccharin.

Authors:  S Mondal; D W Brankow; C Heidelberger
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-09-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Evaluating substances for promotion, cofactor effects and synergy in the carcinogenic process.

Authors:  I B Weinstein
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol       Date:  1980-03

5.  Proportion of cancers due to occupation.

Authors:  J Higginson
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Evidence of safety of long-term, high, oral doses of DDT for man.

Authors:  W J Hayes; W E Dale; C I Pirkle
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1971-01

7.  Organochlorine pesticides and liver cancer deaths in the United States, 1930--1972.

Authors:  W B Deichmann; W E MacDonald
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Effect of bile acids and neutral sterols on benzo[a]pyrene-induced tumorigenesis in skin of mice.

Authors:  K Watanabe; T Narisawa; C Q Wong; J H Weisburger
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Promoting effect of saccharin and DL-tryptophan in urinary bladder carcinogenesis.

Authors:  S M Cohen; M Arai; J B Jacobs; G H Friedell
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Dose response of saccharin in induction of urinary bladder hyperplasias in Fischer 344 rats pretreated with N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine.

Authors:  K Nakanishi; A Hagiwara; M Shibata; K Imaida; M Tatematsu; N Ito
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetics and environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Andrea Baccarelli; Valentina Bollati
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 2.  Listen to nature. The challenge of lifestyle medicine.

Authors:  E L Wynder
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1991

Review 3.  Environmental chemicals and microRNAs.

Authors:  Lifang Hou; Dong Wang; Andrea Baccarelli
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Airborne PAHs inhibit gap junctional intercellular communication and activate MAPKs in human bronchial epithelial cell line.

Authors:  Ondřej Brózman; Jiří Novák; Alison K Bauer; Pavel Babica
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 4.860

5.  Improving the environmental quality component of the County Health Rankings model.

Authors:  Michael Hendryx; Melissa M Ahern; Keith J Zullig
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Biological effects of fibers: Stanton's hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  J Dunnigan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Environmental pollution effects on reproductive health - clinical-epidemiological study in southern Italy.

Authors:  M L Marra; F Zullo; B De Felice; L Nappi; M Guida; M Trifuoggi; C Nappi; A Di Spiezio Sardo; B Zizolfi; G Capece; F Visconti; J Troisi; C Ciccone; M Guida
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2012-10-11

8.  Bile acids, but not neutral sterols, are tumor promoters in the colon in man and in rodents.

Authors:  J H Weisburger; B S Reddy; W S Barnes; E L Wynder
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals in humans from rodent bioassay data.

Authors:  G Goodman; R Wilson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Telomeres in toxicology: Occupational health.

Authors:  Mohammad Shoeb; Helen C S Meier; James M Antonini
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 12.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.