Literature DB >> 6863155

Spatial receptive fields in the cat inferior colliculus.

M N Semple, L M Aitkin, M B Calford, J D Pettigrew, D P Phillips.   

Abstract

Auditory spatial receptive fields of 122 single units in the inferior colliculus of 8 anesthetised cats were studied with free-field acoustic stimuli presented in the frontal hemisphere. The best frequency and best frequency threshold were determined for each unit with the speaker located in a position where the unit responded strongly. The intensity was then raised to 10 dB above threshold at the best frequency and the boundaries of the spatial receptive field were determined. For sounds of low intensity, receptive field size appeared to be a continuum with respect to best frequency. Units of high best frequency had small circumscribed fields located in the contralateral frontal hemifield. The boundaries of receptive fields for units of progressively lower best frequency expanded in all directions. Thus for intermediate frequencies, fields typically filled the contralateral hemifield whereas for low frequencies, units could be activated by stimulation from any position tested. At higher intensities, the boundaries of the receptive fields of units expanded. Circumscribed receptive field centres lay on a line corresponding to the acoustical axis of the contralateral pinna. For these units with small receptive fields, the free-field response to low intensity sounds appeared to be attributable more to the directional properties of the contralateral pinna than to significant binaural interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6863155     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(83)90054-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  16 in total

1.  The coding of spatial location by single units in the lateral superior olive of the cat. II. The determinants of spatial receptive fields in azimuth.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The coding of spatial location by single units in the lateral superior olive of the cat. I. Spatial receptive fields in azimuth.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Rapid adaptation to auditory-visual spatial disparity.

Authors:  Jörg Lewald
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Two models for transforming auditory signals from head-centered to eye-centered coordinates.

Authors:  J M Groh; D L Sparks
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Auditory cortex neurons sensitive to correlates of auditory motion: underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  J M Toronchuk; E Stumpf; M S Cynader
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Level dependence of spatial processing in the primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neural mechanisms of directional hearing in the pigeon.

Authors:  J Lewald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Spatial tuning to sound-source azimuth in the inferior colliculus of unanesthetized rabbit.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Kuwada; Brian Bishop; Caitlin Alex; Daniel W Condit; Duck O Kim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The structure of spatial receptive fields of neurons in primary auditory cortex of the cat.

Authors:  J F Brugge; R A Reale; J E Hind
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Processing of interaural time and intensity differences in the cat inferior colliculus.

Authors:  D Caird; R Klinke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.