Literature DB >> 6861098

Assessment of response of bone metastases to systemic treatment in patients with breast cancer.

R C Coombes, P Dady, C Parsons, V R McCready, H T Ford, J C Gazet, T J Powles.   

Abstract

Seventy-one patients with breast cancer and bone metastases, together with other assessable sites of disease, were monitored by radiologic skeletal survey, bone scanning, pain charts, bone marrow aspirate, serum calcium, alkaline phosphatase and urine hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio. On the basis of UICC criteria of response in nonosseous sites, 37 were classed as responders and 34 as nonresponders. Responding patients with osteolytic disease frequently showed sclerosis, but only at 6-8 months, whereas patients with mixed lytic/sclerotic or sclerotic metastases frequently showed no change or further sclerosis. Nonresponders most frequently showed progressive lysis. Bone scanning showed clear evidence of improvement or deterioration in 7/21 responders and 8/23 nonresponders who showed no definite evidence of progression or response on skeletal radiography. Pain assessment was also useful in these patients. Neither the bone marrow aspirate nor other biochemical tests were useful in assessing response to therapy. This study concludes that bone scanning and pain assessment are both useful in assessment of response of bone metastases to treatment in some patients and incorporation into a standard criteria of response is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6861098     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830815)52:4<610::aid-cncr2820520406>3.0.co;2-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  19 in total

1.  18F-fluoride PET: changes in uptake as a method to assess response in bone metastases from castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with 223Ra-chloride (Alpharadin).

Authors:  Gary Cook; Chris Parker; Sue Chua; Bernadette Johnson; Anne-Kirsti Aksnes; Val J Lewington
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.138

2.  Lytic bone metastases after APD in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  M R Williams; M P Mohajer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-11-05

3.  The flare phenomenon: far from fair and square.

Authors:  W D van Schelven; E K Pauwels
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-05

4.  The effect of two different doses of oral clodronate on pain in patients with bone metastases.

Authors:  A Arican; F Içli; H Akbulut; M Cakir; O Sencan; M Samur; N Açikgöz; A Demirkazik
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Pamidronate. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in resorptive bone disease.

Authors:  A Fitton; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  An objective biochemical assessment of therapeutic response in metastatic breast cancer: a study with external review of clinical data.

Authors:  M R Williams; A Turkes; D Pearson; K Griffiths; R W Blamey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  Imaging response to systemic therapy for bone metastases.

Authors:  Tobias Bäuerle; Wolfhard Semmler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Imaging metastatic bone disease from carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  C Messiou; G Cook; N M deSouza
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Biochemical prediction of response of bone metastases to treatment.

Authors:  R E Coleman; K B Whitaker; D W Moss; G Mashiter; I Fogelman; R D Rubens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Histological grade and steroid receptor content of primary breast cancer--impact on prognosis and possible modes of action.

Authors:  C Kamby; J Andersen; B Ejlertsen; N E Birkler; L Rytter; K Zedeler; S M Thorpe; T Nørgaard; C Rose
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.