Literature DB >> 685934

Colonic motility in domestic turkeys.

H C Lai, G E Duke.   

Abstract

This study was performed to determine (1) if electrical slow waves could be recorded from the colon of turkeys, and (2) how ingesta moves into and through the colon despite colonic antiperistalsis. Electrical activity and contractile forces were monitored via implanted bipolar electrodes and strain gage transducers (SGT), respectively. Two types of slow waves, small (sSW) and large (lSW) were recorded simultaneously. The former were correlated with antiperistaltic contractions observed radiographically and with small contractions recorded with SGT, the latter were correlated with large contractions recorded via SGT. The sSW had higher frequencies distally than proximally while the frequency gradient for the lSW was just the opposite. The sSWs were believed to be involved in regulation of antiperistalsis while the lSW were believed to be involved in regulation of the large contractions which, on the basis of the lSW frequency gradient, appeared to be peristaltic and to be primarily responsible for aborad movement of colonic digesta. The small contractions were believed to be responsible for reflux of urine from the cloaca into the colon and ceca and for cecal filling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 685934     DOI: 10.1007/BF01072351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dig Dis        ISSN: 0002-9211


  13 in total

1.  The use of strain gage transducers to study gastroduodenal motility in turkeys.

Authors:  G E Duke; T E Kostuch
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Electrical activity and intraluminal pressures in the lower small intestine of turkeys.

Authors:  G E Duke; T E Kostuch; O A Evanson
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1975-11

3.  Gastroduodenal electrical activity in turkeys.

Authors:  G E Duke; T E Kostuch; O A Evanson
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1975-11

4.  The architecture of the avian gut and tolerance of crude fibre.

Authors:  E T HALNAN
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1949       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Sites of organic acid production and pattern of digesta movement in the gastrointestinal tract of geese.

Authors:  E T Clemens; C E Stevens; M Southworth
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Filling and emptying of the galliform caecum.

Authors:  L Fenna; D A Boag
Journal:  Can J Zool       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 1.597

7.  Migrating spike bursts and electrical slow waves in the cat colon: effect of sectioning.

Authors:  J Christensen; S Anuras; R L Hauser
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Renal and cloacal salt and water transport in the fowl (Gallus domesticus).

Authors:  E Skadhauge
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  1973-10

9.  A radiographic study of urine flow in the domestic fowl.

Authors:  A R Akester; R S Anderson; K J Hill; G W Osbaldiston
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.095

10.  A possible urinary backflow to ceca revealed by studies on chicks with artificial anus and fed amprolium-C14 or thiamine-C14.

Authors:  D Polin; E R Wynosky; M Loukides; C C Porter
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  3 in total

1.  Higher-level production of volatile fatty acids in vitro by chicken gut microbiotas than by human gut microbiotas as determined by functional analyses.

Authors:  Fang Lei; Yeshi Yin; Yuezhu Wang; Bo Deng; Hongwei David Yu; Lanjuan Li; Charlie Xiang; Shengyue Wang; Baoli Zhu; Xin Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Quantitative Morphometric, Physiological, and Metabolic Characteristics of Chickens and Mallards for Physiologically Based Kinetic Model Development.

Authors:  Colin G Scanes; Johannes Witt; Markus Ebeling; Stephan Schaller; Vanessa Baier; Audrey J Bone; Thomas G Preuss; David Heckmann
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 3.  Large intestinal dynamics differ between fowl and swine: Anatomical modifications, microbial collaboration, and digestive advantages from fibrolytic enzymes.

Authors:  Edwin T Moran; Michael R Bedford
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2022-07-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.