Literature DB >> 6853916

The QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size: clinical, angiographic and prognostic correlations.

G S Roubin, W F Shen, D T Kelly, P J Harris.   

Abstract

The relation between a QRS score derived from the routine electrocardiogram and left ventricular function was investigated in 181 patients after myocardial infarction. Patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and conduction defects were excluded. The QRS score correlated closely with the severity of wall motion abnormalities and left ventricular ejection fraction. The more severe the dyssynergy, the higher the QRS score (hypokinesia = 3.0; akinesia = 5.4; dyskinesia = 9.1). The left ventricular ejection fraction (percent) = 66 - (3.3 x QRS score) (correlation coefficient [r] = -0.81, probability [p] less than 0.001). With use of this regression equation, the QRS score predicted angiographic left ventricular ejection fraction to within 12% of the angiographic ejection fraction in 29 of 30 additional patients studied prospectively. The QRS score was also related to clinical functional class. The worse the clinical manifestation of left ventricular dysfunction, the higher the QRS score (Killip class I = 3.5; class II = 6.5; class III = 7.1). A QRS score greater than or equal to 7 had a specificity of 97% and a sensitivity of 59% for predicting an ejection fraction of less than 45%. Patients with a QRS score of 7 or greater had severe wall motion abnormalities, higher peak serum creatine kinase levels, higher prevalence of multivessel coronary disease, poor clinical functional class and an unfavorable outcome. The QRS score provides an inexpensive, clinically useful estimate of left ventricular function after myocardial infarction and can identify patients at high risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6853916     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80374-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  6 in total

1.  Diagnostic utility of specific electrocardiographical parameters in predicting left ventricular function.

Authors:  Altug Cincin; Beste Ozben; Okan Erdogan
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2012

2.  Limitations of a QRS scoring system to assess left ventricular function and prognosis at hospital discharge after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  P Fioretti; R W Brower; E Lazzeroni; M L Simoons; W Wijns; J H Reiber; R J Bos; P G Hugenholtz
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-03

3.  A detailed guide for quantification of myocardial scar with the Selvester QRS score in the presence of electrocardiogram confounders.

Authors:  Zak Loring; Sreetharan Chelliah; Ronald H Selvester; Galen Wagner; David G Strauss
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.438

4.  An ECG index of myocardial scar enhances prediction of defibrillator shocks: an analysis of the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial.

Authors:  David G Strauss; Jeanne E Poole; Galen S Wagner; Ronald H Selvester; Julie M Miller; Jill Anderson; George Johnson; Steven E McNulty; Daniel B Mark; Kerry L Lee; Gust H Bardy; Katherine C Wu
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Transient giant negative T wave in acute anterior myocardial infarction predicts R wave recovery and preservation of left ventricular function.

Authors:  H Agetsuma; M Hirai; H Hirayama; A Suzuki; C Takanaka; S Yabe; H Inagaki; F Takatsu; H Hayashi; H Saito
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Complete versus simplified Selvester QRS score for infarct severity assessment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Christina Tiller; Martin Reindl; Sebastian Johannes Reinstadler; Magdalena Holzknecht; Michael Schreinlechner; Alexander Peherstorfer; Nicolas Hein; Ivan Lechner; Agnes Mayr; Gert Klug; Bernhard Metzler
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.298

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.