Literature DB >> 23592938

Diagnostic utility of specific electrocardiographical parameters in predicting left ventricular function.

Altug Cincin1, Beste Ozben, Okan Erdogan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Changes in electrocardiography (ECG) parameters, including sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, bundle branch blocks, Q waves and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, are commonly observed in patients with heart failure (HF).
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether specific ECG parameters have a diagnostic role in predicting LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in patients with suspected HF.
METHODS: A total of 123 patients with symptoms or signs of HF and 20 HF patients with New York Heart Association class IV status were consecutively recruited. Several ECG parameters, including QRS duration, dispersion and SV1 or SV2 + RV5 or RV6 ≥3.5 mV (Goldberger's first criterion), QRS amplitude ≤0.8 mV in the limb leads (Goldberger's second criterion) and RV4/SV4 <1 (Goldberger's third criterion), were subsequently determined and correlated with LV ejection fraction (LVEF).
RESULTS: One hundred six patients had LVEF <50% (LVSD group), while 37 patients had LVEF ≥50% (non-LVSD group). The maximal QRS duration of the LVSD group was significantly longer than that of the non-LVSD group (124.5±20.8 ms versus 109.7±13.1 ms; P<0.001). ROC analysis revealed that a cut-off point of QRS duration ≥124 ms significantly predicted LVSD (OR 4.1 [95% CI 1.7 to 10.2]; P=0.001). The frequencies of Goldberger's first and third criteria were higher in the LVSD group (OR 8.3 [95% CI 1.9 to 36.4]; P=0.001; and OR 8.9 [95% CI 3.4 to 23.2]; P<0.001, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that Goldberger's first and third criteria as well as QRS duration ≥124 ms were independent predictors of LVSD.
CONCLUSION: Bedside ECG parameters, such as the Goldberger criteria, may be useful in predicting LVSD before the use of more sophisticated diagnostic tests is considered in patients with suspected HF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECG; Echocardiography; Ejection fraction; Heart failure; QRS

Year:  2012        PMID: 23592938      PMCID: PMC3627277     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 1205-6626


  30 in total

1.  Assessing diagnosis in heart failure: which features are any use?

Authors:  A P Davie; C M Francis; L Caruana; G R Sutherland; J J McMurray
Journal:  QJM       Date:  1997-05

Review 2.  ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

Authors:  Kenneth Dickstein; Alain Cohen-Solal; Gerasimos Filippatos; John J V McMurray; Piotr Ponikowski; Philip Alexander Poole-Wilson; Anna Strömberg; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Dan Atar; Arno W Hoes; Andre Keren; Alexandre Mebazaa; Markku Nieminen; Silvia Giuliana Priori; Karl Swedberg
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 15.534

3.  Risk assessment of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in primary care: cross sectional study evaluating a range of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  O W Nielsen; J F Hansen; J Hilden; C T Larsen; J Svanegaard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-22

4.  Ultrastructural studies of myocardial biopsies in 45 patients with obstructive or congestive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  V J Ferrans; R A Massumi; G I Shugoll; N Ali; W C Roberts
Journal:  Recent Adv Stud Cardiac Struct Metab       Date:  1973

5.  Prevalence of left-ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure in the Echocardiographic Heart of England Screening study: a population based study.

Authors:  M Davies; F Hobbs; R Davis; J Kenkre; A K Roalfe; R Hare; D Wosornu; R J Lancashire
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Goldberger's electrocardiographic triad in patients with echocardiographic severe left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Christina Lopez; Camelia C Ilie; D Luke Glancy; Roberto E Quintal
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Should general practitioners use the electrocardiogram to select patients with suspected heart failure for echocardiography?

Authors:  A R Houghton; N J Sparrow; E Toms; A J Cowley
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1997-10-31       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  QRS prolongation on surface ECG and brain natriuretic peptide as indicators of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Authors:  S Krüger; K Filzmaier; J Graf; D Kunz; T Stickel; R Hoffmann; P Hanrath; U Janssens
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  A QRS scoring system for assessing left ventricular function after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S T Palmeri; D G Harrison; F R Cobb; K G Morris; F E Harrell; R E Ideker; R H Selvester; G S Wagner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-01-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  A comparative analysis of the results from 4 trials of beta-blocker therapy for heart failure: BEST, CIBIS-II, MERIT-HF, and COPERNICUS.

Authors:  Michael J Domanski; Heidi Krause-Steinrauf; Barry M Massie; Prakash Deedwania; Dean Follmann; David Kovar; David Murray; Ron Oren; Yves Rosenberg; James Young; Michael Zile; Eric Eichhorn
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.712

View more
  2 in total

1.  ECG as a first step in the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the elderly.

Authors:  Line Lisbeth Olesen; Andreas Andersen
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2015-10-30

2.  Wave intensity of aortic root pressure as diagnostic marker of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Bernhard Hametner; Stephanie Parragh; Thomas Weber; Siegfried Wassertheurer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.